文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

胃癌跳跃淋巴结转移的临床病理特征及预测列线图

Clinicopathologic characteristics and predictive nomogram of skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Xinwei, Du Yuwei, Li Yuegang, Xue Chi, Zhu Zhi

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 12;15:1590133. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1590133. eCollection 2025.


DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1590133
PMID:40874226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12378048/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) status is an independent factor affecting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Skip metastasis is a pattern of LN metastasis across a peritumoral (PT) area to an extra-peritumoral (EP) area. The purpose of the present study was to determine the clinical characteristics and establish a predictive nomogram for skip metastasis in gastric cancer. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1657 gastric cancer patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. The patients were categorized in four groups: only station II (skip group); only station I (PT-only group); station I and station II (PT+EP group); and no metastatic LNs (N0 group). The clinical characteristics between the skip group and the other three groups were compared. RESULTS: The incidence of skip metastasis was 3.3% (55/1657) among the gastric cancer patients. The most common locations of skip metastasis were the No. 7 (50.9%), No. 8a (32.7%), No. 9 (21.8%), and No. 1 groups (20.0%). The skip group had significant differences compared to the PT+EP group in pN stage, Borrmann type, pT stage and location, as predictors in the nomogram for prediction of skip metastasis. The area under the ROC curve was 0.908. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified key risk factors for skip lymph node metastasis and developed the first clinically applicable predictive model. The resulting nomogram demonstrated high accuracy in risk stratification, providing a visual tool to optimize lymph node dissection strategies. These findings support incorporating metastatic location into gastric cancer staging systems and the location of LN metastasis should be considered to improve the LN staging.

摘要

背景:淋巴结(LN)状态是影响胃癌患者预后的独立因素。跳跃转移是一种淋巴结转移模式,即从肿瘤周围(PT)区域跨越至肿瘤外周围(EP)区域。本研究的目的是确定胃癌跳跃转移的临床特征并建立预测列线图。 方法:我们回顾了中国医科大学附属第一医院1657例胃癌患者的病历。患者被分为四组:仅第II站(跳跃组);仅第I站(仅PT组);第I站和第II站(PT + EP组);以及无转移淋巴结(N0组)。比较了跳跃组与其他三组之间的临床特征。 结果:胃癌患者中跳跃转移的发生率为3.3%(55/1657)。跳跃转移最常见的部位是第7组(50.9%)、第8a组(32.7%)、第9组(21.8%)和第1组(20.0%)。在预测跳跃转移的列线图中,作为预测指标,跳跃组与PT + EP组在pN分期、Borrmann分型、pT分期和部位方面存在显著差异。ROC曲线下面积为0.908。 结论:本研究确定了跳跃淋巴结转移的关键危险因素,并开发了首个临床适用的预测模型。所得列线图在风险分层中显示出高准确性,为优化淋巴结清扫策略提供了一种直观工具。这些发现支持将转移部位纳入胃癌分期系统,并且应考虑淋巴结转移的部位以改善淋巴结分期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/6ac973ea7172/fonc-15-1590133-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/5d78694d5acb/fonc-15-1590133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/fc8b13b662e8/fonc-15-1590133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/0144970333b0/fonc-15-1590133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/9a05cbb70553/fonc-15-1590133-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/6ac973ea7172/fonc-15-1590133-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/5d78694d5acb/fonc-15-1590133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/fc8b13b662e8/fonc-15-1590133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/0144970333b0/fonc-15-1590133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/9a05cbb70553/fonc-15-1590133-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a520/12378048/6ac973ea7172/fonc-15-1590133-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Clinicopathologic characteristics and predictive nomogram of skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Front Oncol. 2025-8-12

[2]
Characteristics and prognosis of skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a retrospective study.

World J Surg Oncol. 2025-7-24

[3]
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-2-6

[4]
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks

2025-1

[5]
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-9-1

[6]
Level V Metastases in Node-Positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Beyond Level IIA and III.

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2024

[7]
Lymph node metastasis prediction model for each lymph node station in gastric cancer patients.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025-8

[8]
Development and validation of a prognostic model for overall survival in pN0 esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a SEER database-based study.

J Thorac Dis. 2025-5-30

[9]
Prediction of the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint) high versus low risk by nomograms among axillary lymph node positive (LN+) and negative (LN-) Chinese breast cancer patients, a retrospective study.

BMC Cancer. 2025-7-1

[10]
The pattern of lymph node metastasis and the suitability of 7th UICC N stage in predicting prognosis of remnant gastric cancer.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011-11-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
Multitask Deep Learning Based on Longitudinal CT Images Facilitates Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival in Chemotherapy-Treated Gastric Cancer.

Cancer Res. 2025-7-2

[2]
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2024

[3]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition).

Gastric Cancer. 2023-1

[4]
Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio compared to the TNM classification in stage III gastric cancer.

Niger J Clin Pract. 2021-11

[5]
The metastatic lymph node ratio is a better prognostic factor than the number of metastatic limph node after curative resection for gastric cancer.

Acta Biomed. 2021-11-3

[6]
Lymph Node Ratio System for N Staging of Gastric Cancer: Challenging for Universal Application But Useful for the Prognostic Prediction of Individual Patients.

J Gastric Cancer. 2021-3

[7]
Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2021-3-17

[8]
Positive lymph node ratio is an index in predicting prognosis for remnant gastric cancer with insufficient retrieved lymph node in R0 resection.

Sci Rep. 2021-1-21

[9]
Lymph Node Ratio Predicts Long-Term Survival in Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Eur J Breast Health. 2020-7-29

[10]
Accurate Risk Stratification of Patients with Node-Positive Gastric Cancer by Lymph Node Ratio.

World J Surg. 2020-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索