Suppr超能文献

袖状胃切除术后单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的围手术期安全性概况

Perioperative safety profile of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy.

作者信息

Manueli Laos Emiliano G, Zhang Lily, Berger Reed, Bianco Francesco, Abdelhady Khaled, Schlottmann Francisco, Masrur Mario A

机构信息

Division of Minimally Invasive & Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Departments of Surgery and Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.07.019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is highly effective for weight management, revisional procedures are often needed after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). While Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has historically been the most commonly performed revisional procedure, single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) is a more recently endorsed alternative.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety profile of revisional RYGB and SADI after SG in the first postoperative 30 days.

SETTING

United States of America.

METHODS

Using the 2022-2023 MBSAQIP database, patients undergoing revisional RYGB or SADI after SG were identified and matched using propensity scores. Demographic, medical, and perioperative variables were analyzed, including length of stay, operative time, complications, and 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, a total of 6108 patients were included; 4581 (75.0%) to RYGB group and 1527 (25.0%) to SADI group. Operative times were longer for RYGB (P = .03). Mean length of stay was 1.57 ± 1.84 days for RYGB and 1.44 ± 1.28 days for SADI (P < .01) Postoperative bowel obstruction was more common after RYGB (.9% vs .3%, P = .01). RYGB 30-day readmission rate was 5.5% and reoperation rate was 1.8%. SADI 30-day readmission rate was 4.3% and reoperation rate was 2.2% (P = .06 for readmission rates; P = .3 for reoperation rates). Thirty-day mortality was similarly low in both groups (Group 1: .2%, Group 2: .1%, P > .7).

CONCLUSION

Revisional RYGB and SADI after SG are both safe and associated with low morbidity in a short-term period. However, SADI may offer advantages over RYGB for its lower risk of postoperative bowel obstruction.

摘要

背景

尽管代谢和减重手术(MBS)在体重管理方面非常有效,但袖状胃切除术(SG)后通常需要进行翻修手术。虽然 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)一直是最常进行的翻修手术,但单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术(SADI)是最近被认可的替代方案。

目的

比较 SG 后翻修 RYGB 和 SADI 在术后 30 天内的安全性。

地点

美利坚合众国。

方法

使用 2022 - 2023 年 MBSAQIP 数据库,识别接受 SG 后翻修 RYGB 或 SADI 的患者,并使用倾向评分进行匹配。分析人口统计学、医学和围手术期变量,包括住院时间、手术时间、并发症以及 30 天再入院率、再次手术率和死亡率。

结果

倾向评分匹配后,共纳入 6108 例患者;RYGB 组 4581 例(75.0%),SADI 组 1527 例(25.0%)。RYGB 的手术时间更长(P = 0.03)。RYGB 的平均住院时间为 1.57 ± 1.84 天,SADI 为 1.44 ± 1.28 天(P < 0.01)。RYGB 术后肠梗阻更常见(0.9% 对 0.3%,P = 0.01)。RYGB 的 30 天再入院率为 5.5%,再次手术率为 1.8%。SADI 的 30 天再入院率为 4.3%,再次手术率为 2.2%(再入院率 P = 0.06;再次手术率 P = 0.3)。两组的 30 天死亡率同样较低(第 1 组:0.2%,第 2 组:0.1%,P > 0.7)。

结论

SG 后翻修 RYGB 和 SADI 在短期内均安全且发病率低。然而,SADI 可能因其术后肠梗阻风险较低而比 RYGB 更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验