• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于氢吗啡酮阿片类激动剂治疗兴趣的性别差异:一项针对注射器服务项目参与者的横断面研究。

Gender differences regarding interest in opioid agonist treatment with hydromorphone: a cross-sectional study of syringe service program participants.

作者信息

Lasiychuk Vitaliy, Ghiroli Megan, López-Castro Teresa, Fox Aaron D

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.

Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2025 Aug 29;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01300-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-025-01300-1
PMID:40883756
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the United States, only 15-20% of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) receive medications for OUD annually. Injectable opioid agonist treatment with hydromorphone (iOAT-H) is a novel approach that reduces non-prescribed opioid use. However, interest in iOAT-H among women, who face unique challenges in OUD treatment, may be different than men. This study evaluates women's attitudes toward iOAT-H, and gender disparities in OUD-related risks, exploring potential gender-specific treatment needs. We hypothesized that women would be less interested in iOAT-H than men given the disproportionate stigma women face in accessing OUD treatment.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of urban syringe service program participants. Participants self-reported interest in iOAT-H, which was assessed on a 4-point scale with 3 or 4 considered "interested." Participants also provided self-reported data on preferences for OUD treatment and their OUD-related risks, including frequency of drug use and injection practices. Descriptive statistics and comparative analyses were employed to explore gender differences.

RESULTS

Of 108 participants, 31% were women and 69% were men with a mean age of 43.0 (SD ± 10.8). Almost all participants had severe OUD (98.1%) and had prior OUD care (96.3%). Most women (68%) and men (64%) reported interest in iOAT-H. For OUD treatment preferences, most women chose iOAT-H (56%), while men most commonly endorsed methadone treatment (42%) as their preferred option. Women had more OUD-related risks than men including injecting more times per day (5 vs. 3, p > 0.01) and injecting in public more often (24 vs. 7, p = 0.05) in the past 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Interest in iOAT-H was high among women and men, but we found gender differences in OUD-related risks. This may reflect unmet needs among women who would potentially enter treatment with iOAT-H, but additional work is necessary to examine specific risks such as mental health, trauma exposure, and creating safe treatment spaces for women. Nonetheless, iOAT-H appeared acceptable to women in our sample, and many treatment-experienced people who inject drugs would prefer iOAT-H to other available OUD treatments.

摘要

背景

在美国,每年仅有15%至20%的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者接受OUD药物治疗。注射用氢吗啡酮阿片类激动剂治疗(iOAT-H)是一种可减少非处方阿片类药物使用的新方法。然而,在OUD治疗中面临独特挑战的女性对iOAT-H的兴趣可能与男性不同。本研究评估了女性对iOAT-H的态度以及OUD相关风险中的性别差异,探索潜在的性别特异性治疗需求。我们假设,鉴于女性在获得OUD治疗时面临不成比例的污名,她们对iOAT-H的兴趣会低于男性。

方法

这是一项对城市注射器服务项目参与者横断面研究的二次分析。参与者自行报告对iOAT-H的兴趣,该兴趣通过4分制进行评估,3分或4分被视为“感兴趣”。参与者还提供了关于OUD治疗偏好及其OUD相关风险的自我报告数据,包括药物使用频率和注射方式。采用描述性统计和比较分析来探索性别差异。

结果

在108名参与者中,31%为女性,69%为男性,平均年龄为43.0岁(标准差±10.8)。几乎所有参与者都患有严重的OUD(98.1%)且曾接受过OUD护理(96.3%)。大多数女性(68%)和男性(64%)表示对iOAT-H感兴趣。对于OUD治疗偏好,大多数女性选择iOAT-H(56%),而男性最常认可美沙酮治疗(42%)为其首选方案。女性比男性有更多与OUD相关的风险,包括在过去30天内每天注射次数更多(5次对3次,p>0.01)以及更频繁地在公共场合注射(24次对7次,p=0.05)。

结论

女性和男性对iOAT-H的兴趣都很高,但我们发现了与OUD相关风险中的性别差异。这可能反映了可能接受iOAT-H治疗的女性未被满足的需求,但有必要开展更多工作来研究诸如心理健康、创伤暴露以及为女性创造安全治疗空间等特定风险。尽管如此,在我们的样本中iOAT-H似乎为女性所接受,并且许多有注射吸毒治疗经验的人更喜欢iOAT-H而非其他可用的OUD治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Gender differences regarding interest in opioid agonist treatment with hydromorphone: a cross-sectional study of syringe service program participants.关于氢吗啡酮阿片类激动剂治疗兴趣的性别差异:一项针对注射器服务项目参与者的横断面研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Aug 29;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01300-1.
2
High Interest in Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment With Hydromorphone Among Urban Syringe Service Program Participants.城市注射毒品者服务项目参与者对氢吗啡酮类注射阿片激动剂治疗有浓厚兴趣。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Jan;45(1):44-53. doi: 10.1177/29767342231210552.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Patterns of use and adverse events reported among persons who regularly inject buprenorphine: a systematic review.经常注射丁丙诺啡的人群的使用模式和报告的不良事件:系统评价。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Oct 13;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00695-5.
5
Barriers and facilitators to injectable opioid agonist treatment engagement within a structural vulnerability context: a qualitative study of patient experiences in Vancouver, Canada.在结构性脆弱背景下注射用阿片类激动剂治疗参与的障碍与促进因素:对加拿大温哥华患者经历的定性研究
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jul 4;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01262-4.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Effectiveness of methadone versus buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid use disorder: secondary analyses of prospective cohort study data.美沙酮与丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的有效性:前瞻性队列研究数据的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e095645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095645.
8
Opioids for cancer pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews.用于癌症疼痛的阿片类药物——Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD012592. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012592.pub2.
9
Needle syringe programmes and opioid substitution therapy for preventing hepatitis C transmission in people who inject drugs.针具交换计划和阿片类药物替代疗法预防注射吸毒者丙型肝炎传播
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9(9):CD012021. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012021.pub2.
10
Treatment History and Interest in Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment With Hydromorphone Among People Who Inject Drugs.在注射吸毒者中,海洛因相关治疗史与氢吗啡酮注射类阿片激动剂治疗的兴趣。
J Addict Med. 2023;17(3):e148-e155. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001093. Epub 2022 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the evidence and the politics: Implementation trial of supervised injectable opioid treatment (SIOT) in Australia.弥合证据与政策之间的差距:澳大利亚监督下注射用阿片类药物治疗(SIOT)的实施试验。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Apr;138:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104749. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Trauma exposure across the lifespan among individuals engaged in treatment with medication for opioid use disorder: differences by gender, PTSD status, and chronic pain.接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的个体在其一生中所经历的创伤:按性别、创伤后应激障碍状态和慢性疼痛的差异
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 May 3;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00608-8.
3
Public Health Interventions and Overdose-Related Outcomes Among Persons With Opioid Use Disorder.
公共卫生干预措施与阿片类药物使用障碍患者相关的药物过量结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4617.
4
High Interest in Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment With Hydromorphone Among Urban Syringe Service Program Participants.城市注射毒品者服务项目参与者对氢吗啡酮类注射阿片激动剂治疗有浓厚兴趣。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Jan;45(1):44-53. doi: 10.1177/29767342231210552.
5
Treatment History and Interest in Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment With Hydromorphone Among People Who Inject Drugs.在注射吸毒者中,海洛因相关治疗史与氢吗啡酮注射类阿片激动剂治疗的兴趣。
J Addict Med. 2023;17(3):e148-e155. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001093. Epub 2022 Oct 16.
6
Women's experiences in injectable opioid agonist treatment programs in Vancouver, Canada.加拿大温哥华注射类阿片类药物激动剂治疗项目中女性的经历。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jul;117:104054. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104054. Epub 2023 May 14.
7
Buprenorphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies.丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类药物依赖:随机和观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;10(6):386-402. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00095-0. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Interest in treatment with injectable diacetylmorphine among people who use opioids in Baltimore City, Maryland (USA).马里兰州巴尔的摩市使用阿片类药物人群对注射用二乙酰吗啡治疗的兴趣(美国)。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2196435. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2196435.
9
Has the treatment gap for opioid use disorder narrowed in the U.S.?: A yearly assessment from 2010 to 2019".美国阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗差距是否缩小了?2010 年至 2019 年的年度评估。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Dec;110:103786. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103786. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Prevalence of mental disorders among people with opioid use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.患有阿片类药物使用障碍人群中心境障碍的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Sep 1;238:109551. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109551. Epub 2022 Jul 1.