Elmahdy Ahmed, Krasnikova Maryna, Jha Abhishek, Pylova Tetiana, Espinosa Aaron Shekka, Zulfaj Ermir, Andersson Erik Axel, Kalani Mana, Banerjee Aditi, Hammarsten Ola, Omerovic Elmir, Redfors Björn
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 5 B Wallenbergslab/SU, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 30;15(1):32006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17442-y.
Ischemic preconditioning (PreC), remote perconditioning (PerC), and postconditioning (PostC) are known to reduce myocardial infarct size, but their relative efficacy and potential additive effects remain unclear. This study compared the individual and combined effects of PreC, PerC, and PostC on infarct size and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels in a rat model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. Fifty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 40 min of coronary occlusion followed by 2 h of reperfusion. They were randomized into six groups: Control, PreC, PerC, PostC, PerC + PostC, or PreC + PerC + PostC. Infarct size was measured using Evans blue/TTC staining, and cTnI levels were assessed. All conditioning strategies significantly reduced infarct size and cTnI levels compared to control (p < 0.001). PreC and PreC + PerC + PostC were the most effective, while PostC was the least. No additive benefit was seen when combining PreC with other strategies (p = 0.9) or PerC with PostC (p = 0.9). These findings suggest that PreC provides the greatest cardioprotection, and combining conditioning strategies does not enhance outcomes, possibly due to overlapping protective mechanisms.
已知缺血预处理(PreC)、远隔预处理(PerC)和后处理(PostC)可减小心肌梗死面积,但其相对疗效和潜在的叠加效应仍不明确。本研究比较了PreC、PerC和PostC单独及联合应用对心肌缺血再灌注大鼠模型梗死面积和心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)水平的影响。54只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠经历40分钟冠状动脉闭塞,随后2小时再灌注。它们被随机分为六组:对照组、PreC组、PerC组、PostC组、PerC + PostC组或PreC + PerC + PostC组。使用伊文思蓝/TTC染色测量梗死面积,并评估cTnI水平。与对照组相比,所有预处理策略均显著减小梗死面积并降低cTnI水平(p < 0.001)。PreC和PreC + PerC + PostC最有效,而PostC最无效。PreC与其他策略联合(p = 0.9)或PerC与PostC联合(p = 0.9)均未观察到叠加益处。这些发现表明PreC提供了最大的心脏保护作用,联合预处理策略并未改善结果,这可能是由于保护机制重叠所致。