Suppr超能文献

密歇根州单孔(SP)机器人辅助部分肾切除术的采用情况及围手术期结局:一项MUSIC-KIDNEY分析

Adoption and perioperative outcomes of single-port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy in the state of Michigan: a MUSIC-KIDNEY analysis.

作者信息

Wang Yuzhi, Zhuo Jerry, Christensen Bradley, Chen Kangli, Daignault-Newton Stephanie, Hussain Banna, Gammons Mackenzie, Almajedi Mustafa, Grandy Savannah, Matynowski Adam, Noyes Sabrina L, Mirza Mahin, Shetty Sugandh, Jafri Syed Mohammed A, Tobert Conrad, Brede Christopher, Rogers Craig G, Lane Brian R, Nelson Ryan

机构信息

Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.

Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 30;19(1):535. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02518-8.

Abstract

Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a standard-of-care nephron-sparing intervention for clinical stage T1 renal masses (cT1RMs). We evaluated RPN outcomes performed using the da Vinci single port (SP) and multiport (Xi) platforms in a statewide quality improvement collaborative since SP introduction in Michigan. MUSIC-KIDNEY maintains a prospective registry of newly diagnosed cT1RM. Six surgeons from three practices within MUSIC have performed both. The perioperative data from patients undergoing SP and Xi RPN with these surgeons October 2020-August 2023 were analyzed. These surgeons completed a survey to assess reasons for choosing SP over Xi RPN. Of 828 RPNs performed by all MUSIC surgeons in the same duration, a total of 314 (38%) RPNs were completed by the six included surgeons who performed 121 (39%) RPNs with SP and 193 (61%) with Xi. SP RPN more commonly utilized the retroperitoneal approach than Xi RPN (80% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). When comparing perioperative outcomes, the experienced SP surgeon utilized same-day (55% vs. 9.5% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001) and opioid-free discharge (77% vs. 22% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) significantly more than other urologists for both SP and Xi cases without a significant increase in positive surgical margins, ED visits, or readmissions. The survey results showed that surgeons early in the learning curve for SP RPN prefer to use SP for smaller, less complex masses. Although there has been limited adoption of SP RPN, initial experiences with SP RPN demonstrate procedural safety comparable to Xi RPN. Both robotic systems provide advantages, with SP mainly facilitating the retroperitoneal approach.

摘要

机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RPN)是临床T1期肾肿物(cT1RMs)保留肾单位治疗的标准干预措施。自密歇根州引入单孔(SP)技术以来,我们在全州范围内的质量改进协作中评估了使用达芬奇单孔和多孔(Xi)平台进行的RPN手术结果。MUSIC - KIDNEY维护着新诊断cT1RM的前瞻性登记册。来自MUSIC内三个医疗机构的六位外科医生都进行过这两种手术。分析了2020年10月至2023年8月期间这些外科医生为接受SP和Xi RPN手术患者的围手术期数据。这些外科医生完成了一项调查,以评估选择SP而非Xi RPN的原因。在同一时期内,MUSIC所有外科医生共进行了828例RPN手术,其中六位纳入研究的外科医生完成了314例(38%),他们使用SP进行了121例(39%)RPN手术,使用Xi进行了193例(61%)。与Xi RPN相比,SP RPN更常采用腹膜后入路(80%对6.1%,p < 0.001)。比较围手术期结果时,经验丰富的SP外科医生在SP和Xi手术病例中,当日出院(55%对9.5%对5.7%,p < 0.001)和无阿片类药物出院(77%对22%对18%,p < 0.001)的比例显著高于其他泌尿外科医生,且手术切缘阳性、急诊就诊或再入院率无显著增加。调查结果显示,处于SP RPN学习曲线早期的外科医生更倾向于对较小、不太复杂的肿物使用SP。尽管SP RPN的应用有限,但SP RPN的初步经验表明其手术安全性与Xi RPN相当。两种机器人系统都有优势,SP主要便于采用腹膜后入路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验