Suppr超能文献

多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶同步放化疗治疗晚期外耳道鳞状细胞癌患者:与基于顺铂的同步放化疗的比较

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for patients with advanced external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

作者信息

Ueki Yushi, Ohno Yuki, Ohshima Shusuke, Yokoyama Yusuke, Omata Jo, Takahashi Takeshi, Shodo Ryusuke, Saijo Kohei, Ohtaki Kohei, Matsuyama Hiroshi, Aoyama Riku, Ogi Manabu, Takahashi Nao, Horii Arata

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Niigata General Hospital, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Aug 31. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09668-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and fluorouracil (5-FU) (i.e. TPF regimen) has yielded favourable outcomes in treating advanced external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma (EACSCC). However, safety and efficacy have not been compared across TPF-CCRT and CDDP-based regimens. This study thus aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TPF-CCRT versus CDDP-CCRT.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 20 patients with T3/T4 EACSCC who underwent CCRT between 2007 and 2023. During radiotherapy, the TPF group (n = 10) received two cycles of 50 mg/m docetaxel and 60 mg/m CDDP on day 1, plus 600 mg/m 5-FU on days 1-4. Meanwhile, the CDDP group (n = 10) received three cycles of CDDP (80 mg/m) triweekly or two cycles of CDDP (60 mg/m) on day 1 and 5-FU (600 mg/m/day) on days 1-4 during RT. Treatment compliance, incidence of adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

All patients completed radiotherapy. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was not significantly different between the TPF and CDDP groups, but leukopenia (any grade) and alopecia occurred more frequently in the TPF group. Two-year PFS (80% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) and OS rates (100% vs. 40%, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the TPF group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CDDP-CCRT, TPF-CCRT has excellent feasibility and efficacy and acceptable toxicity for advanced EACSCC, making it a promising treatment option for this malignancy.

摘要

目的

多西他赛、顺铂(CDDP)和氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)同步放化疗(CCRT)(即TPF方案)在治疗晚期外耳道鳞状细胞癌(EACSCC)方面取得了良好疗效。然而,TPF-CCRT与基于顺铂的方案在安全性和疗效上尚未进行比较。因此,本研究旨在评估TPF-CCRT与CDDP-CCRT的可行性、安全性和疗效。

方法

本回顾性研究评估了20例2007年至2023年间接受CCRT的T3/T4期EACSCC患者。放疗期间,TPF组(n = 10)在第1天接受两个周期的50mg/m²多西他赛和60mg/m²顺铂,外加第1 - 4天600mg/m²的5-FU。同时,CDDP组(n = 10)在放疗期间每三周接受三个周期的顺铂(80mg/m²),或在第1天接受两个周期的顺铂(60mg/m²)以及第1 - 4天接受5-FU(600mg/m²/天)。比较两组的治疗依从性、不良事件发生率、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

所有患者均完成放疗。TPF组和CDDP组≥3级不良事件的发生率无显著差异,但TPF组白细胞减少(任何级别)和脱发的发生率更高。TPF组的两年PFS率(80%对20%,p < 0.01)和OS率(100%对40%,p < 0.01)显著更高。

结论

与CDDP-CCRT相比,TPF-CCRT对晚期EACSCC具有出色的可行性和疗效以及可接受的毒性,使其成为这种恶性肿瘤的一种有前景的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验