• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新辅助激素治疗后采用机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗局部晚期前列腺癌时,保留神经血管束可改善术后控尿功能的恢复:倾向评分匹配分析结果

Neurovascular bundle preservation improves postoperative continence recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: results from a propensity score-matched analysis.

作者信息

Yang Ming, Hong Tianxiao, Ji Hao, Zhao Chaoran, Wang Yamin, Wang Shangqian, Bao Meiling, Li Pengchao

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.

Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing, University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210017, China.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2025 Aug 31;43(1):520. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05794-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05794-z
PMID:40887548
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the oncological outcomes and continence recovery of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) before robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) with neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC).

METHODS

Of the 576 patients with LAPC who underwent RARP during January 2016-March 2024, those who received NHT before RARP with NVB preservation (NVB-RARP) were propensity score (PS)-matched with those undergoing RARP without NVB preservation (NNVB-RARP) based on preoperative and histological characteristics. Clinical and biochemical recurrence results were evaluated post-surgically, and postoperative continence was analyzed in the two groups using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

After PS matching, each group was matched with 77 patients. When compared with the NNVB-RARP group, the NVB-RARP group did not show any significant difference in the operation time (102.72 ± 11.64 min vs.105.05 ± 16.73 min, p = 0.319), postoperative hospitalization time (5.01 ± 0.80 d vs. 5.21 ± 1.13 d, p = 0.248), intraoperative bleeding (158.43 ± 13.76 mL vs. 161.23 ± 15.15 mL, p = 0.232), pathologic tumor stage (≤ pT2) (53.25% vs. 50.65%, p = 0.747), lymph node status (N1) (27.27% vs. 36.36%, p = 0.226), pathological Gleason score (≥ 8) (81.82% vs. 76.62%, p = 0.427), positive surgical margin (15.58% vs. 20.78%, p = 0.403), or complications (9.10% vs.11.69%, p = 0.597). The NVB-RARP group demonstrated significantly faster continence recovery than the NNVB-RARP group (recovery rates: 1 month 42.86% vs. 16.88%, p < 0.001, 3 months 62.34% vs. 36.36%, p = 0.001, and 12 months 83.12% vs. 66.23%, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggest that NHT before RARP with NVB preservation may enhance continence recovery without compromising the oncological outcomes in patients with LAPC.

摘要

目的

评估新辅助激素治疗(NHT)联合保留神经血管束(NVB)的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)对局部晚期前列腺癌(LAPC)患者肿瘤学结局和控尿功能恢复情况的影响。

方法

选取2016年1月至2024年3月期间接受RARP手术的576例LAPC患者,根据术前和组织学特征,将术前接受NHT联合保留NVB的RARP(NVB-RARP)患者与未保留NVB的RARP(NNVB-RARP)患者进行倾向评分(PS)匹配。术后评估临床和生化复发结果,并采用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析两组患者术后的控尿情况。

结果

PS匹配后,每组各有77例患者。与NNVB-RARP组相比,NVB-RARP组在手术时间(102.72±11.64分钟 vs.105.05±16.73分钟,p = 0.319)、术后住院时间(5.01±0.80天 vs. 5.21±1.13天,p = 0.248)、术中出血量(158.43±13.76毫升 vs. 161.23±15.15毫升,p = 0.232)、病理肿瘤分期(≤pT2)(53.25% vs. 50.65%,p = 0.747)、淋巴结状态(N1)(27.27% vs. 36.36%,p = 0.226)、病理Gleason评分(≥8)( 81.82% vs. 76.62%,p = 0.427)、手术切缘阳性率(15.58% vs. 20. 78%,p = 0.403)或并发症发生率(9.10% vs.11.69%,p = 0.597)方面均无显著差异。NVB-RARP组的控尿功能恢复明显快于NNVB-RARP组(恢复率:1个月时为42.86% vs. 16.88%,p < 0.001;3个月时为62.34% vs. 36.36%,p = 0.001;12个月时为83.12% vs. 66.23%,p = 0.016)。

结论

本研究结果表明,对于LAPC患者,RARP术前进行NHT联合保留NVB可促进控尿功能恢复,且不影响肿瘤学结局。

相似文献

1
Neurovascular bundle preservation improves postoperative continence recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: results from a propensity score-matched analysis.在新辅助激素治疗后采用机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗局部晚期前列腺癌时,保留神经血管束可改善术后控尿功能的恢复:倾向评分匹配分析结果
World J Urol. 2025 Aug 31;43(1):520. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05794-z.
2
Cystopexy following anterior-approach robot-assisted radical prostatectomy enhances early continence recovery.前路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的膀胱固定术可促进早期控尿功能恢复。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 12;19(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02253-0.
3
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析报告机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复的研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
5
A comparative analysis of robotic prostatectomy techniques post TURP/HOLEP: retzius-sparing vs. non-retzius approaches: evaluation of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.经尿道前列腺电切术/钬激光前列腺剜除术后机器人前列腺切除术技术的比较分析:保留耻骨后间隙与非保留耻骨后间隙入路:围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局评估
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04423-3.
6
Early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with membranous urethra and neurovascular bundle preservation.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控功能的早期恢复与膜部尿道和神经血管束的保留有关。
Int J Urol. 2024 May;31(5):492-499. doi: 10.1111/iju.15388. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing.保留Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术有助于早期控尿,与保留神经血管束与否无关。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Jul;40(7):4075-4080. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14405.
8
Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中神经血管结构相邻冰冻切片检查(NeuroSAFE):一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Sep 4. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00891-3.
9
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
10
Does transurethral resection of the prostate before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have adverse effects on patients diagnosed with prostate cancer: a comparative evidence-based analysis?在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术之前进行经尿道前列腺切除术对前列腺癌患者有不良影响吗:一项基于证据的比较分析?
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 20;19(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02234-3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy vs Hormonal Therapy in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy.新辅助化疗联合雄激素剥夺治疗对比单纯雄激素剥夺治疗局部进展期前列腺癌根治术后的前瞻性随机临床试验
J Urol. 2024 May;211(5):648-655. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003876. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
2
Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术中双侧与单侧保留神经对尿控的影响是否存在差异?系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 23;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03340-6.
3
Distribution of neurovascular structures within the prostate gland and their relationship to complications after radical prostatectomy.
前列腺内神经血管结构的分布及其与根治性前列腺切除术后并发症的关系。
Prostate. 2024 Apr;84(5):491-501. doi: 10.1002/pros.24667. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
2022 Update on Prostate Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review.2022 年前列腺癌流行病学和风险因素的更新:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2023 Aug;84(2):191-206. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Neoadjuvant Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors before Radical Prostatectomy for Non-Metastatic Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.非转移性晚期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术前新辅助雄激素受体信号抑制剂:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 7;13(4):641. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040641.
6
Erectile function, urinary continence and oncologic outcomes of neurovascular bundle sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经血管束的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌的勃起功能、尿控及肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 5;13:1161544. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161544. eCollection 2023.
7
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the first separate systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌的比较:首个随机对照试验和非随机研究的单独系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1350-1359. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000193.
8
Dose-escalated radiotherapy for clinically localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.剂量递增放疗治疗局限性和局部进展性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 8;3(3):CD012817. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012817.pub2.
9
The progress of dorsal vascular complex control strategy in radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术中文本中背深静脉复合体控制策略的研究进展。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Feb;51(2):3000605231152091. doi: 10.1177/03000605231152091.
10
Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-radioguided Surgery Facilitates Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer with Regional Lymph Node Metastases.前列腺特异性膜抗原放射性导向手术有助于局部晚期前列腺癌伴区域淋巴结转移患者行根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Feb;6(1):95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.12.001. Epub 2023 Jan 4.