Zhao Jiarui, Huang Baiyang, Li Min, Wang Xingpeng, Zhu Jingyu, Wang Kaiyue, Xu Jing, Wang Xiaohan, Meng Xue, Cai Guoxin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025 Sep 1;74(9):296. doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-04159-0.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to contribute to the ongoing discussion regarding adjuvant treatment strategies following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) and adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT) after upfront surgery (US) in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: 317 patients were retrospectively included from 2019 to 2024. 285 received NCIT, while 32 received AIT after US. The patients were categorized into no-treatment (n = 46), chemotherapy (ChT) (n = 38), immunotherapy (IT) (n = 33), chemoimmunotherapy (ChIT) (n = 168), and US + AIT groups. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Groups were compared using the log-rank test. Subgroup analyses include stage, pathological response, and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline differences. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 30.7 months. Before and after PSM, the IT and ChIT groups demonstrated better EFS compared with the no-treatment group. After PSM, EFS was significantly prolonged with IT and ChIT in patients who did not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). In patients who achieved pCR, no benefit in EFS or OS was observed. Among patients with a PD-L1 expression of ≥ 1%, EFS was significantly improved with IT and ChIT compared with the no-treatment and US + AIT groups respectively. Similar EFS benefits for IT and ChIT were observed across stage IB-IIB and IIIA-IIIB subgroups. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant IT or ChIT potentialy benefit patients with resectable NSCLC receiving NCIT, particularly those without pCR and with positive PD-L1 expression.
背景:我们旨在为正在进行的关于可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在新辅助化疗免疫治疗(NCIT)和 upfront 手术(US)后辅助免疫治疗(AIT)的辅助治疗策略的讨论做出贡献。 方法:回顾性纳入 2019 年至 2024 年的 317 例患者。285 例接受 NCIT,32 例在 US 后接受 AIT。患者被分为无治疗组(n = 46)、化疗(ChT)组(n = 38)、免疫治疗(IT)组(n = 33)、化疗免疫治疗(ChIT)组(n = 168)和 US + AIT 组。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估无进展生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)。使用对数秩检验比较各组。亚组分析包括分期、病理反应和程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达水平。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡基线差异。 结果:中位随访时间为 30.7 个月。在 PSM 前后,IT 组和 ChIT 组的 EFS 均优于无治疗组。PSM 后,未达到病理完全缓解(pCR)的患者接受 IT 和 ChIT 治疗后 EFS 显著延长。在达到 pCR 的患者中,未观察到 EFS 或 OS 有获益。在 PD-L1 表达≥1%的患者中,IT 组和 ChIT 组的 EFS 分别较无治疗组和 US + AIT 组显著改善。在 IB-IIB 期和 IIIA-IIIB 期亚组中,IT 组和 ChIT 组的 EFS 获益相似。 结论:辅助 IT 或 ChIT 可能使接受 NCIT 的可切除 NSCLC 患者获益,尤其是那些没有 pCR 且 PD-L1 表达阳性的患者。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025-9-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-6-2
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2025-6-20
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024-9-2
N Engl J Med. 2024-5-16
N Engl J Med. 2023-11-2