Suppr超能文献

在漏斗胸微创修复术中,与气管插管相比,喉罩气道具有更好的恢复效果和效率:一项回顾性分析。

Superior recovery and efficiency with laryngeal mask airway compared to endotracheal intubation in minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Sollmann Manuel, Bode Lena Marie, Krämer Sebastian, Lacher Martin, Müller Sarah Dorothea, Breidenbach Salome, Greul Franziska, Zimmermann Peter, Piegeler Tobias

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03320-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive repair is the standard treatment for patients with pectus excavatum. Recent data suggest that using a laryngeal mask airway during thoracic surgery might offer advantages over endotracheal intubation, such as faster recovery from surgery, shorter anesthesia times and fewer complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of laryngeal mask airway use in minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of electronic anesthesia protocols and records of patients who underwent pectus excavatum repair at a large academic center between 2019 and 2024. Perioperative data, complications, and procedural times were evaluated. Patients who had their airways secured with endotracheal intubation were compared to those who were ventilated using a laryngeal mask.

RESULTS

Data of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 32 with endotracheal intubation, n = 16 for laryngeal mask). The use of a laryngeal mask significantly shortened anesthesia induction time (4.0 vs. 7.5 min, p = 0.002), recovery time (9.1 vs. 19.0 min, p = 0.002) and emergence time (7.0 vs. 17.0 min, p < 0.001). Patients in the laryngeal mask group also had a significantly reduced need for postoperative oxygen supplementation (6.3 vs. 36.8%, p = 0.008). There were fewer anesthesiologic complications when a laryngeal mask was used, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (6.3 vs. 18.5%, p = 0.65). Hospital (6 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.81) and ICU length of stay (21.73 vs. 23.84 h, p = 0.31), surgical complications (18.8 vs. 15.6%, p = 0.79) and incision-suture time (90.3 vs. 89.7 min, p = 0.92) were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a laryngeal mask in minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair is safe and effective. Its advantages- reduced respiratory complications and shorter anesthesia-related times-support its use as an alternative airway device for this procedure for medical as well as for economic reasons.

摘要

背景

微创修复是漏斗胸患者的标准治疗方法。最近的数据表明,在胸外科手术中使用喉罩气道可能比气管插管具有优势,例如手术恢复更快、麻醉时间更短且并发症更少。本研究的目的是评估在微创漏斗胸修复中使用喉罩气道的安全性和潜在益处。

方法

对2019年至2024年期间在一个大型学术中心接受漏斗胸修复的患者的电子麻醉方案和记录进行回顾性分析。评估围手术期数据、并发症和手术时间。将通过气管插管确保气道安全的患者与使用喉罩通气的患者进行比较。

结果

分析了48例患者的数据(气管插管组n = 32,喉罩组n = 16)。使用喉罩显著缩短了麻醉诱导时间(4.0分钟对7.5分钟,p = 0.002)、恢复时间(9.1分钟对19.0分钟,p = 0.002)和苏醒时间(7.0分钟对17.0分钟,p < 0.001)。喉罩组患者术后吸氧需求也显著降低(6.3%对36.8%,p = 0.008)。使用喉罩时麻醉相关并发症较少,尽管这一差异未达到统计学意义(6.3%对18.5%,p = 0.65)。两组的住院时间(6天对5.5天,p = 0.81)、重症监护病房住院时间(21.73小时对23.84小时,p = 0.31)、手术并发症(18.8%对15.6%,p = 0.79)和切口缝合时间(90.3分钟对89.7分钟,p = 0.92)相当。

结论

在微创漏斗胸修复中使用喉罩是安全有效的。其优势——减少呼吸道并发症和缩短麻醉相关时间——从医学和经济角度支持将其用作该手术的替代气道装置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验