Sivakumar Bhavana, Kurian Gino A
Cardiovascular Center, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, India.
J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2025 Sep;39(9):e70471. doi: 10.1002/jbt.70471.
The present study addresses the toxicological impact of Particulate matter (PM) exposure on the pharmacological efficacy of ischemia preconditioning (IPC) and postconditioning (POC) against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. The primary motivation for this study is the gap in knowledge regarding the effectiveness of IPC and POC in PM modified hearts. With the increasing prevalence of cardiac procedures involving IR and PM toxicity, there is a growing need to understand their interaction. Female Wistar rats were subjected to PM exposure for 3 h daily over a period of 21 days. Subsequently, their hearts were excised and mounted on a Langendorff perfusion apparatus. Three cycles of IPC and POC were applied, followed by the IR protocol. In contrast to hearts under normal conditions, neither IPC nor POC could reduce cardiac injury (infarct size, apoptosis, and inflammation) or enhance cardiac function in PM-exposed hearts subjected to IR. The underlying reason for this ineffectiveness was identified as the inability to improve mitochondrial bioenergetic function and the expression of the declined master regulator gene Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1-α). Additionally, the compromised mitochondrial quality control genes resulting from PM exposure could not be restored to their normal levels by these conventional strategies. Furthermore, the crucial pro-survival signaling pathways like phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) could not be reactivated by these strategies in PM-exposed hearts undergoing IR, consequently preventing the restoration of cardioprotection. From the above results, we deduce that the therapeutic benefits of mechanical conditioning techniques such as IPC and POC were compromised in hearts exposed to PM, primarily attributed to PM induced mitochondrial dysfunction.
本研究探讨了颗粒物(PM)暴露对缺血预处理(IPC)和后处理(POC)抗缺血再灌注(IR)损伤药理疗效的毒理学影响。本研究的主要动机是关于IPC和POC在PM修饰心脏中的有效性的知识空白。随着涉及IR和PM毒性的心脏手术的患病率增加,越来越需要了解它们之间的相互作用。雌性Wistar大鼠在21天内每天暴露于PM 3小时。随后,取出它们的心脏并安装在Langendorff灌注装置上。应用三个周期的IPC和POC,然后进行IR方案。与正常条件下的心脏相比,在接受IR的PM暴露心脏中,IPC和POC均不能减轻心脏损伤(梗死面积、细胞凋亡和炎症)或增强心脏功能。这种无效的根本原因被确定为无法改善线粒体生物能量功能以及主调节基因过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ共激活因子1α(PGC1-α)表达的下降。此外,PM暴露导致的线粒体质量控制基因受损无法通过这些传统策略恢复到正常水平。此外,在接受IR的PM暴露心脏中,这些策略无法重新激活关键的促生存信号通路,如磷脂酰肌醇3激酶/蛋白激酶B(PI3K/AKT),从而阻止了心脏保护的恢复。从上述结果中,我们推断,在暴露于PM的心脏中,IPC和POC等机械调节技术的治疗益处受到损害,主要归因于PM诱导的线粒体功能障碍。