Stoychev Kaloyan, Veleva Ivanka, Mineva-Dimitrova Eleonora, Chumpalova Petranka, Dimitrova Emiliya
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University and University Hospital Pleven, 113 Storgozia district, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University Pleven, Bulgaria.
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Aug 21;42:100388. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100388. eCollection 2025 Dec.
psychotic disorders induced by substances like marijuana, amphetamines and methamphetamines (SIPDs) are a growing mental health problem, yet the question do they represent a separate psychotic class independent from schizophrenia (SZ) still stands. Studies comparing clinical and cognitive performance of SIPD and SZ patients have produced inconsistent results.
we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 62 subjects divided into two statistically matched groups ( = 31 each) with SZ and SIPD respectively. We compared the clinical severity of their symptoms as measured by the positive and negative PANSS scores. We then applied the following neurocognitive battery - 10 Words Memory Test of Luria for verbal learning and verbal memory; Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Benton Visual Retention Test for processing speed and visual memory; Trail Making Test Part A & B for attention and cognitive flexibility (along with DSST); Logical Memory Test (LMT) for episodic memory and thinking disorders; Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) for semantic memory and language. We referenced the performance results of the two groups to the normative values of each of the tests.
SZ subjects had significantly higher positive and negative PANSS scores and greater impairment in all cognitive domains except semantic memory and language (VFT). Compared to the normative values of all tests both SZ and SIPD patients performed poorer.
Our data support the assumption that the two conditions share a common underlying neurobiological vulnerability that is more pronounced quantitatively in schizophrenia.
由大麻、苯丙胺和甲基苯丙胺等物质诱发的精神障碍(SIPD)是一个日益严重的心理健康问题,但它们是否代表一种独立于精神分裂症(SZ)的精神障碍类别这一问题仍然存在。比较SIPD和SZ患者临床及认知表现的研究结果并不一致。
我们对62名受试者进行了横断面分析,将其分为两个统计学匹配组(每组n = 31),分别为SZ组和SIPD组。我们比较了用阳性和阴性PANSS评分衡量的症状临床严重程度。然后我们应用了以下神经认知测试组合——用于言语学习和言语记忆的鲁利亚10词记忆测试;用于处理速度和视觉记忆的数字符号替换测试(DSST)和本顿视觉保持测试;用于注意力和认知灵活性的连线测验A和B(与DSST一起);用于情景记忆和思维障碍的逻辑记忆测试(LMT);用于语义记忆和语言的言语流畅性测试(VFT)。我们将两组的表现结果与每个测试的常模值进行对照。
SZ组受试者的阳性和阴性PANSS评分显著更高,并且在除语义记忆和语言(VFT)之外的所有认知领域的损害更大。与所有测试的常模值相比,SZ组和SIPD组患者的表现均较差。
我们的数据支持这样一种假设,即这两种情况存在共同的潜在神经生物学易损性,在精神分裂症中这种易损性在数量上更为明显。