Waissman Pola, Berant Ron, Amir Lisa, Reif Shimon, Springer Shmuel
Neuromuscular and Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Front Pediatr. 2025 Aug 14;13:1624070. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1624070. eCollection 2025.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a global health concern. This study evaluates the utility of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) as a tool for assessing PFC among clinicians with varying levels of ultrasound (US) experience. We assessed the validity of PsUS in measuring transverse rectal diameter (TRD) and rectal anterior wall thickness (RAWT) compared to conventional US and to evaluate agreement between expert and novice clinicians.
In this cross-sectional study, TRD and RAWT were measured using conventional US and PsUS in 52 children (PFC: = 28; non-constipated: = 24), aged 4-14 years. Measurements were performed by an experienced and a novice clinician. Agreement and validity were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
High agreement was found between the experienced and novice clinicians in assessing PFC using conventional US (ICC for TRD = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99; ICC for RAWT = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99) and PsUS (ICC for TRD = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99; ICC for RAWT = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98). PsUS showed robust validity compared to conventional US (ICCs of 0.96 for TRD and 0.87 for RAWT). ROC analysis showed high diagnostic accuracy for PsUS at TRD [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.88, cut-off 30.25 mm] and RAWT (AUC = 0.91, cut-off 2.05 mm).
These results suggest PsUS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing PFC, that can be used by clinicians with varying levels of US experience.
背景/目的:小儿功能性便秘(PFC)是一个全球关注的健康问题。本研究评估袖珍超声(PsUS)作为一种工具,在不同超声(US)经验水平的临床医生中用于评估PFC的效用。我们将PsUS测量直肠横径(TRD)和直肠前壁厚度(RAWT)的有效性与传统超声进行比较,并评估专家和新手临床医生之间的一致性。
在这项横断面研究中,对52名4至14岁儿童(PFC:28例;非便秘:24例)使用传统超声和PsUS测量TRD和RAWT。测量由一名经验丰富的临床医生和一名新手临床医生进行。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估一致性和有效性,并使用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断准确性。
经验丰富的临床医生和新手临床医生在使用传统超声评估PFC方面具有高度一致性(TRD的ICC = 0.98,95%CI:0.98 - 0.99;RAWT的ICC = 0.98,95%CI:0.97 - 0.99)以及在使用PsUS方面(TRD的ICC = 0.99,95%CI:0.97 - 0.99;RAWT的ICC = 0.97,95%CI:0.96 - 0.98)。与传统超声相比,PsUS显示出较强的有效性(TRD的ICC为0.96,RAWT的ICC为0.87)。ROC分析显示PsUS在TRD[曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.88,截断值30.25 mm]和RAWT(AUC = 0.91,截断值2.05 mm)方面具有较高的诊断准确性。
这些结果表明PsUS是一种评估PFC的有效且可靠的工具,不同超声经验水平的临床医生均可使用。