Qiu Feng, Zhou Ai-Zhen, Guo Lin, Wang Lei, Zhang Xian
Wuxi Xinwu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi 214026, Jiangsu, China.
Wuxi Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Wuxi 214071, Jiangsu, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2025 Aug 25;38(8):779-85. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240883.
To explore the clinical efficacy of orthopedic manipulation combined with daoyin exercises in the treatment of chronic lumbar disc herniation under the guidance of the theory of "equal emphasis on muscles and bones".
A total of 60 patients with single-segment, unilateral chronic lumbar disc herniation from January 2023 to January 2024 were randomly divided into the traditional physical therapy group and the manipulation treatment group, with 30 cases in each group. Among them, 3 cases were lost to follow-up in the traditional physical therapy group and 2 cases in the manipulation treatment group. There were 27 cases in the traditional physical therapy group, including 15 males and 12 females, aged 25 to 65 years old with an average of (51.96±14.42) years;the course of disease ranged from 3 to 15 months with an average of (9.89±3.32) months;11 cases were on the left side and 16 cases on the right side;15 cases were at the L4, 5 segment and 12 cases at the L5S1 segment. They were treated with lumbar traction, medium-frequency electrical stimulation and ultrasonic therapy. There were 28 cases in the manipulation treatment group, including 14 males and 14 females, aged 24 to 68 years old with an average of (49.82±14.85) years old;the course of disease ranged from 3 to 14 months with an average of (9.61±3.05) months;15 cases were on the left side and 13 cases on the right side;17 cases were at the L4, 5 segment and 11 cases at the L5S1 segment. They were treated with orthopedic manipulation combined with daoyin exercises. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and bilateral erector spinae muscle tone were compared between the two groups before treatment, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment.
The two groups of patients were followed up and evaluated before treatment, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment. The VAS of the manipulation treatment group and the traditional physical therapy group decreased from (5.46±0.99) and (5.41±1.05) points before treatment to (1.75±0.79) and (2.29±0.82) points after 4 weeks of treatment, respectively. Both groups were significantly improved after treatment compared with before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (<0.05);and the manipulation treatment group was better than the traditional physical therapy group at 4 weeks of treatment, with a statistically significant difference (<0.05). The ODI of the manipulation treatment group and the traditional physical therapy group before treatment was (20.25±2.72) and (18.96±2.52) points, respectively, which decreased to (15.46±1.88) and (16.56±2.01) points after 2 weeks of treatment, and to (11.54±1.23) and (12.85±1.72) points after 4 weeks of treatment. Both groups were significantly improved after treatment compared with before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (<0.05), and the ODI in the manipulation treatment group was better than that in the traditional physical therapy group after treatment (<0.05). There was no significant statistical difference in the displacement of erector spinae muscle tone between the healthy side and the affected side in both the manipulation treatment group and the traditional physical therapy group before treatment (>0.05). After 2 weeks of treatment, the displacement values of erector spinae muscle tone on the healthy side in the manipulation treatment group and the traditional physical therapy group were (6.68±0.81) mm and (6.45±0.65) mm, respectively, and those on the affected side were (5.87±0.82) mm and (5.61±0.84) mm, respectively. After 4 weeks of treatment, the displacement values of erector spinae muscle tone on the healthy side in the manipulation treatment group and the traditional physical therapy group were (7.51±0.75) mm and (7.04±0.63) mm, respectively, and those on the affected side were (6.87±0.78) mm and (6.33±0.82) mm, respectively. The displacement values of erector spinae muscle tone on both the healthy and affected sides in both groups were significantly higher than those before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (<0.05);the displacement of erector spinae muscle tone in the manipulation treatment group after 4 weeks of treatment was better than that in the traditional physical therapy group, with a statistically significant difference (<0.05).
Orthopedic manipulation combined with daoyin exercises can effectively improve the symptoms and lumbar function of patients with chronic lumbar disc herniation, and has more advantages in improving the tone of the erector spinae muscle.
在“筋骨并重”理论指导下,探讨正骨手法联合导引功法治疗慢性腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。
选取2023年1月至2024年1月单节段、单侧慢性腰椎间盘突出症患者60例,随机分为传统物理治疗组和手法治疗组,每组30例。其中,传统物理治疗组失访3例,手法治疗组失访2例。传统物理治疗组27例,男性15例,女性12例,年龄25~65岁,平均(51.96±14.42)岁;病程3~15个月,平均(9.89±3.32)个月;左侧11例,右侧16例;L4、5节段15例,L5S1节段12例。采用腰椎牵引、中频电刺激及超声波治疗。手法治疗组28例,男性14例,女性14例,年龄24~68岁,平均(49.82±14.85)岁;病程3~14个月,平均(9.61±3.05)个月;左侧15例,右侧13例;L4、5节段17例,L5S1节段11例。采用正骨手法联合导引功法治疗。比较两组治疗前、治疗2周及4周后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)及双侧竖脊肌肌张力。
两组患者治疗前、治疗后2周及4周均进行随访评估。手法治疗组和传统物理治疗组VAS评分由治疗前的(5.46±0.99)分和(5.41±1.05)分,分别降至治疗4周后的(1.75±0.79)分和(2.29±0.82)分。两组治疗后与治疗前比较均有显著改善,差异有统计学意义(<0.05);且治疗4周时手法治疗组优于传统物理治疗组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。手法治疗组和传统物理治疗组治疗前ODI分别为(20.25±2.72)分和(18.96±2.52)分,治疗2周后分别降至(15.46±1.88)分和(16.56±2.01)分,治疗4周后分别降至(11.54±1.23)分和(12.85±1.72)分。两组治疗后与治疗前比较均有显著改善,差异有统计学意义(<0.05),且治疗后手法治疗组ODI优于传统物理治疗组(<0.05)。手法治疗组和传统物理治疗组治疗前患侧与健侧竖脊肌肌张力差值比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。治疗2周后,手法治疗组和传统物理治疗组健侧竖脊肌肌张力差值分别为(6.68±0.81)mm和(6.45±0.65)mm,患侧分别为(5.87±0.82)mm和(5.61±0.84)mm。治疗4周后,手法治疗组和传统物理治疗组健侧竖脊肌肌张力差值分别为(7.51±0.75)mm和(7.04±0.63)mm,患侧分别为(6.87±0.78)mm和(6.33±0.82)mm。两组健侧和患侧竖脊肌肌张力差值均显著高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(<0.05);治疗4周时手法治疗组竖脊肌肌张力差值优于传统物理治疗组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。
正骨手法联合导引功法能有效改善慢性腰椎间盘突出症患者的症状及腰椎功能,在提高竖脊肌肌张力方面更具优势。