• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经外侧横突入路椎间固定装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的安全性和有效性:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究

Safety and Efficacy of Interspinous Fixation Device via Lateral Transverse Approach in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Single Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.

作者信息

Soto Eliezer, Esposito Michael F

机构信息

Interventional Spine and Pain Institute, Vero Beach, Florida, USA.

University of Central Florida, College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2025 Aug 27;18:4431-4441. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S522987. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S522987
PMID:40901384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12399849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition that limits function due to reduced space for neurovascular structures. Traditional direct open lumbar decompression (DOLD) is the standard treatment after conservative measures fail. Recently, minimally invasive options such as percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression (PILD), interspinous spacers (ISS), and interspinous fixation devices (ISFD) have gained popularity for moderate LSS without spinal instability.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ISFD in patients with LSS treated at our center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 45 patients (26 males, 19 females) treated with ISFD between January 2023 and October 2024 were analyzed. Adverse events and pain outcomes were recorded using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure.

RESULTS

Only one minor complication was reported on the procedure day. procedure day. Mean NRS pain scores improved from 7.5 (baseline) to 3.5 (2 weeks), 3.0 (1 month), and 3.5 (3 months) (P < 0.001). At 2 weeks, 50% of patients had pain reductions ≥51%; at 1 month, 57.4% experienced ≥51% reduction; and by 3 months, 73% had more than 50% pain reduction (P < 0.001), indicating significant pain improvement over time.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center retrospective study with a small sample size and relatively short follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

ISFD appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for LSS. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to compare devices and refine procedural techniques.

摘要

背景

腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是一种常见的脊柱退行性疾病,由于神经血管结构的空间减小而限制功能。传统的直接开放腰椎减压术(DOLD)是保守治疗失败后的标准治疗方法。最近,诸如经皮影像引导腰椎减压术(PILD)、棘突间撑开器(ISS)和棘突间固定装置(ISFD)等微创选择在治疗无脊柱不稳的中度LSS患者中受到欢迎。

目的

本回顾性研究评估了ISFD在本中心治疗的LSS患者中的安全性和有效性。

患者与方法

分析了2023年1月至2024年10月期间接受ISFD治疗的45例患者(26例男性,19例女性)的数据。使用数字评分量表(NRS)在术前基线、术后2周、1个月和3个月记录不良事件和疼痛结果。

结果

手术当天仅报告了1例轻微并发症。平均NRS疼痛评分从7.5(基线)改善至3.5(2周)、3.0(1个月)和3.5(3个月)(P<0.001)。在2周时,50%的患者疼痛减轻≥51%;在1个月时,57.4%的患者疼痛减轻≥51%;到3个月时,73%的患者疼痛减轻超过50%(P<0.001),表明随着时间推移疼痛有显著改善。

局限性

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,样本量小且随访时间相对较短。

结论

ISFD似乎是一种安全有效的LSS微创治疗方法。需要更大规模的随机对照试验来比较不同装置并完善手术技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3398/12399849/2c9ca6e0a880/JPR-18-4431-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3398/12399849/6d1f68af1f8e/JPR-18-4431-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3398/12399849/88a06f7fd25c/JPR-18-4431-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3398/12399849/2c9ca6e0a880/JPR-18-4431-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3398/12399849/6d1f68af1f8e/JPR-18-4431-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3398/12399849/88a06f7fd25c/JPR-18-4431-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3398/12399849/2c9ca6e0a880/JPR-18-4431-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Interspinous Fixation Device via Lateral Transverse Approach in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Single Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.经外侧横突入路椎间固定装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的安全性和有效性:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究
J Pain Res. 2025 Aug 27;18:4431-4441. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S522987. eCollection 2025.
2
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.
3
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD010264. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010264.pub2.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.棘突间装置在老年腰椎退变患者中是否安全有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
6
Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD009644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009644.pub2.
7
Efficacy and safety of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells with and without hyaluronic acid for treatment of chronic low back pain: A prospective, randomized, double blind, concurrent-controlled 36-month study.含透明质酸与不含透明质酸的同种异体间充质前体细胞治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、同期对照的36个月研究。
Spine J. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.015.
8
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.与传统椎板切除术相比,后路减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD010036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010036.pub2.
9
Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Central and Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis: A Combined Uni-Portal and Bi-Portal Approach.经皮内镜减压治疗腰椎中央及侧隐窝椎管狭窄症:单通道与双通道联合入路
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jul 17;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00002. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
10
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual . single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical . asymmetrical plate designs.推进棘突间固定装置的设计以改善生物力学性能:双. 单锁定固定螺钉机制以及对称. 不对称钢板设计。
J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):386-394. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-13. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison.使用微创棘突间固定装置进行间接减压与标准开放直接减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的24个月疗效:一项前瞻性比较
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 13;17:2079-2097. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S453343. eCollection 2024.
3
Prospective 5-year follow-up of L5-S1 versus L4-5 midline decompression and interspinous-interlaminar fixation as a stand-alone treatment for spinal stenosis compared with laminectomies.与椎板切除术相比,L5-S1与L4-5中线减压及棘突间-椎板间固定作为脊柱狭窄的独立治疗方法的前瞻性5年随访研究。
J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 25;9(4):398-408. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-49. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Instrumented Posterior Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine: Prospective Study Evaluating Fusion Outcomes in Patients Receiving an Interspinous Fixation Device for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Diseases.腰椎后路器械融合术:一项前瞻性研究,评估接受棘突间固定装置治疗退行性脊柱疾病患者的融合效果。
J Pain Res. 2023 Aug 24;16:2909-2918. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S417319. eCollection 2023.
5
Interspinous-Interbody Fusion via a Strictly Lateral Surgical Approach: A Biomechanical Stabilization Comparison to Constructs Requiring Both Lateral and Posterior Approaches.经严格外侧手术入路的棘突间椎体间融合术:与需要外侧和后路联合入路的植入物的生物力学稳定性比较
Cureus. 2023 Jul 15;15(7):e41918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41918. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
A Prospective, Observational, Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Multicenter Study Measuring Functional Outcomes in a Novel Interspinous Fusion Device in Subjects with Low Back Pain: REFINE Study.
Pain Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):187-199. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00447-0. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
7
Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).微创腰椎管狭窄症治疗2.0最佳实践(MIST):美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)的共识指南。
J Pain Res. 2022 May 5;15:1325-1354. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S355285. eCollection 2022.
8
Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device.新型微创腰椎棘突间融合装置安全性与有效性的多中心回顾性研究
J Pain Res. 2021 May 31;14:1525-1531. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S304957. eCollection 2021.
9
Interspinous Process (ISP) Devices in Comparison to the Use of Traditional Posterior Spinal Instrumentation.与传统后路脊柱内固定器械使用情况相比的棘突间装置
Cureus. 2021 Mar 14;13(3):e13886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13886.
10
Late-week surgery and discharge to specialty care associated with higher costs and longer lengths of stay after elective lumbar laminectomy.择期腰椎椎板切除术后,周末手术及转至专科护理会带来更高的费用和更长的住院时间。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Apr 6;34(6):864-870. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201403. Print 2021 Jun 1.