Anract Julien, Florin Marie, Larnaudie Laura, Peyromaure Michael, Delongchamps Nicolas Barry
Cochin Hospital, Urology Department APHP, Université Paris Cité Paris France.
INSERM U1151, Team 5 Institut Necker Enfants Malades (INEM) Paris France.
BJUI Compass. 2025 Sep 2;6(9):e70073. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70073. eCollection 2025 Sep.
To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space using 10% dextrose for focal therapy of posterior prostate tumours.
We included consecutive patients who underwent focal therapy for a posterior prostate tumour with a prior injection of 10% dextrose in the prostato-rectal space, between October 2024 and February 2025. The main outcomes were to evaluate the space created using this technique. As the technique used for hydrodissection was modelled on periprostatic nerve block, we analysed a cohort of patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsies with periprostatic nerve block using 20 ml of lidocaine, to compare the prostato-rectal spaces created by 10% dextrose and by lidocaine.
A total of 11 patients underwent a focal therapy with a prior 20 ml 10% dextrose hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space. Fifteen patients who underwent prostatic biopsies using a periprostatic nerve block (20 ml of lidocaine), with similar characteristics, were included. The median prostato-rectal space created with dextrose and with lidocaine was 8.9 [8.0; 9.9] and 6.7 [6.4; 8.4] mm, respectively (p = 0,17). The prostato-rectal space decreased slower with dextrose: 0.03 mm/min vs 0.1 mm/min (p = 0,02). The prostato-rectal space was higher at the end of focal therapy procedures (7.9 vs 6.6 mm, p = 0,033), despite a longer procedure time in focal therapy (37 vs 8 min, p < 0,001). At the end of focal therapy procedures, all patients had a prostato-rectal space > 5 mm. No hydrodissection-related adverse event was observed.
These initial results suggest that hydrodissection of the prostate-rectal space using 20 ml 10% dextrose, injected following a standard periprostatic nerve block protocol, is feasible, reproducible and safe for a focal therapy procedure for localized posterior prostate tumours.
评估使用10%葡萄糖进行前列腺直肠间隙水分离术用于前列腺后部肿瘤局部治疗的可行性和安全性。
我们纳入了2024年10月至2025年2月期间连续接受前列腺后部肿瘤局部治疗且之前在前列腺直肠间隙注射过10%葡萄糖的患者。主要结局是评估使用该技术所形成的间隙。由于水分离术所采用的技术是以前列腺周围神经阻滞为模型,我们分析了一组接受经会阴前列腺活检并使用20毫升利多卡因进行前列腺周围神经阻滞的患者,以比较10%葡萄糖和利多卡因所形成的前列腺直肠间隙。
共有11例患者在进行局部治疗前接受了20毫升10%葡萄糖的前列腺直肠间隙水分离术。纳入了15例使用前列腺周围神经阻滞(20毫升利多卡因)进行前列腺活检且特征相似的患者。用葡萄糖和利多卡因所形成的前列腺直肠间隙中位数分别为8.9[8.0;9.9]毫米和6.7[6.4;8.4]毫米(p = 0.17)。葡萄糖使前列腺直肠间隙缩小的速度较慢:0.03毫米/分钟对0.1毫米/分钟(p = 0.02)。尽管局部治疗的手术时间更长(37分钟对8分钟,p < 0.001),但在局部治疗程序结束时前列腺直肠间隙更高(7.9对6.6毫米,p = 0.033)。在局部治疗程序结束时,所有患者的前列腺直肠间隙均>5毫米。未观察到与水分离术相关的不良事件。
这些初步结果表明,按照标准的前列腺周围神经阻滞方案注射20毫升10%葡萄糖进行前列腺直肠间隙水分离术,对于局限性前列腺后部肿瘤的局部治疗程序是可行、可重复且安全的。