Latif Mehr, Simi Pete, Blee Kathleen, DeMichele Matthew
University of Massachusetts Boston, USA.
Chapman University, USA.
Emot Soc. 2023 Jun;5(3):348-365. doi: 10.1332/263169021x16841228834058.
In this article, we present empirical evidence on the cognitive processes underlying racist beliefs and judgement. We draw on 47 life history interviews with former members of White supremacist groups to better understand how social interactions and stimuli from the wider environment inform cognitive pathways or how people think. While we examine both deliberate and intuitive pathways to racist belief, we focus on the intuitive ways that extreme racist beliefs are cognitively processed before, during and after an individual is involved in the White supremacist movement. In doing so, we fill a critical gap in the literature by providing an empirical analysis of intuition. We illustrate the analytic contributions of our approach, and we conclude by drawing on our evidence to elucidate three puzzles, including: (1) why racist beliefs persist; (2) how people draw on implicit beliefs to make explicit judgements; and (3) how explicit beliefs become encoded in intuitive pathways.
在本文中,我们展示了关于种族主义信仰和判断背后认知过程的实证证据。我们对47名白人至上主义团体前成员进行了生活史访谈,以更好地理解社会互动和来自更广泛环境的刺激如何影响认知路径,即人们如何思考。虽然我们考察了形成种族主义信仰的刻意和直观路径,但我们关注的是在个人参与白人至上主义运动之前、期间和之后,极端种族主义信仰在认知过程中的直观方式。通过这样做,我们通过提供对直觉的实证分析填补了文献中的一个关键空白。我们阐述了我们方法的分析贡献,并通过依据我们的证据阐明三个谜题来得出结论,其中包括:(1)为什么种族主义信仰持续存在;(2)人们如何利用隐性信仰做出明确判断;以及(3)明确信仰如何在直观路径中被编码。