Suppr超能文献

采用电阻抗断层成像技术评估腹腔镜围手术期的机械通气模式

Evaluation of mechanical ventilation modes in the laparoscopic perioperative period with electrical impedance tomography.

作者信息

Li Zhiwei, Wu Yang, Yu Yao, Liu Kai, Tian Hang, Yao Jiafeng, Cheng Qiuju

机构信息

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China.

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 8;20(9):e0331194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331194. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Uncertainty persists regarding the optimal mode of mechanical ventilation for laparoscopic perioperative periods. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an effective tool for monitoring and guiding lung-protective ventilation. This study aimed to compare the effects of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) on pulmonary ventilation during laparoscopic surgery.

METHOD

This trial was a randomized crossover study, with the laparoscopic perioperative period divided into five phases: pre-anesthesia induction (AWAKE), post-anesthesia induction (BEGIN), the first phase of surgery (MIDDLE-1), the second phase of surgery (MIDDLE-2), and pre-wakefulness (END). EIT data were recorded at each phase, and EIT parameters were calculated to quantify pulmonary ventilation performance in both spatial and temporal dimensions.

RESULTS

During the surgical period, plateau pressure (Pplat) and driving pressure (ΔP) under PCV-VG were lower, while the oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was higher compared to VCV. Furthermore, PCV-VG was associated with an increased center of ventilation (45.1 ± 3.7 vs. 41.7 ± 3.5, P < 0.05), a decrease in global inhomogeneity (GI) (0.85 ± 0.16 vs. 1.06 ± 0.30, P < 0.05), and a reduction in regional ventilation delay index (RVDI) (10.5 ± 4.5 vs. 15.9 ± 5.3, P < 0.05), when compared to VCV. The improvements in pulmonary ventilation were more pronounced with PCV-VG compared to VCV during the surgical period, compared to the non-surgical period.

CONCLUSION

EIT parameters reveal significant differences in ventilation between VCV and PCV-VG during the laparoscopic perioperative period. PCV-VG improves ventilation inhomogeneity and mitigates ventilation delay caused by the Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum during surgery. PCV-VG is more effective than VCV in optimizing intraoperative lung ventilation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2400089365.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜围手术期机械通气的最佳模式仍存在不确定性。电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)是监测和指导肺保护性通气的有效工具。本研究旨在比较压力控制通气-容量保证(PCV-VG)和容量控制通气(VCV)对腹腔镜手术期间肺通气的影响。

方法

本试验为随机交叉研究,将腹腔镜围手术期分为五个阶段:麻醉诱导前(清醒)、麻醉诱导后(开始)、手术第一阶段(中间-1)、手术第二阶段(中间-2)和苏醒前(结束)。在每个阶段记录EIT数据,并计算EIT参数以在空间和时间维度上量化肺通气性能。

结果

在手术期间,与VCV相比,PCV-VG下的平台压(Pplat)和驱动压(ΔP)较低,而氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)较高。此外,与VCV相比,PCV-VG与通气中心增加(45.1±3.7对41.7±3.5,P<0.05)、整体不均匀性(GI)降低(0.85±0.16对1.06±0.30,P<0.05)以及区域通气延迟指数(RVDI)降低(10.5±4.5对15.9±5.3,P<0.05)相关。与非手术期相比,手术期间PCV-VG与VCV相比,肺通气的改善更为明显。

结论

EIT参数显示在腹腔镜围手术期VCV和PCV-VG之间的通气存在显著差异。PCV-VG改善通气不均匀性,并减轻手术期间头低脚高位和气腹引起的通气延迟。PCV-VG在优化术中肺通气方面比VCV更有效。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2400089365。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd2a/12416645/f94a5d9a0307/pone.0331194.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验