Dearolf Michelle, Westmoreland Drew A, Mirzayi Chloe, Guo Yan, D'Angelo Alexa, Pantalone David W, Carrico Adam W, Grov Christian
Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04858-w.
Self-testing for HIV is an accessible, effective testing method for clinical and research contexts. From 2017 to 2022, we conducted annual, mail-in HIV testing with participants in our U.S. national longitudinal cohort of 6253 sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined factors associated with failure to deliver HIV-positive results by phone despite extensive outreach. Of 16,000 samples tested, 315 were reactive (98% cisgender sexual minority men). We successfully delivered two-thirds of reactive results (n = 209). Unsuccessful result delivery was associated with frequent (once/week or more) methamphetamine use (OR = 2.195, p = .004), one or more recent HIV-positive sexual partner(s) (OR = 2.764, p < .001), and at least one indicator of socioeconomic vulnerability (OR = 2.413, p < .001). In the adjusted model, only socioeconomic vulnerability (AOR = 1.864, p = .034) and recent HIV-positive partner(s) (AOR = 2.220, p = .005) remained significant. Finally, we performed an exploratory cross-sectional mediation analysis, which suggested the impact of frequent methamphetamine use on failure to deliver HIV results was mediated by socioeconomic vulnerability, with significant indirect effect (ab = - 0.056, p = .002) and total effect (c = - 0.184, p = .008). Although remote self-testing can help SGM access HIV testing, difficulties remain in successfully delivering stigmatizing and stressful information like HIV results-particularly to those using methamphetamine or experiencing socioeconomic vulnerabilities, and those with HIV-positive sex partner(s) who may suspect a positive result. Tailored strategies are needed to better connect these populations into the status-neutral HIV care continuum.
艾滋病毒自我检测是一种适用于临床和研究环境的、有效的检测方法。2017年至2022年期间,我们对美国一个由6253名性少数和性别少数(SGM)个体组成的全国性纵向队列中的参与者进行了年度邮寄艾滋病毒检测。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析,研究了尽管进行了广泛的宣传,但仍未能通过电话告知艾滋病毒检测呈阳性结果的相关因素。在16000份检测样本中,有315份呈反应性(98%为顺性别性少数男性)。我们成功告知了三分之二呈反应性的结果(n = 209)。结果告知未成功与频繁(每周一次或更多)使用甲基苯丙胺(比值比[OR] = 2.195,p = 0.004)、近期有一个或多个艾滋病毒检测呈阳性的性伴侣(OR = 2.764,p < 0.001)以及至少一项社会经济脆弱性指标(OR = 2.413,p < 0.001)有关。在调整后的模型中,只有社会经济脆弱性(调整后比值比[AOR] = 1.864,p = 0.034)和近期有艾滋病毒检测呈阳性的伴侣(AOR = 2.220,p = 0.005)仍然具有统计学意义。最后,我们进行了一项探索性横断面中介分析,结果表明频繁使用甲基苯丙胺对未能告知艾滋病毒检测结果的影响是由社会经济脆弱性介导的,具有显著的间接效应(ab = -0.056,p = 0.002)和总效应(c = -0.184,p = 0.008)。尽管远程自我检测有助于SGM群体进行艾滋病毒检测,但在成功告知诸如艾滋病毒检测结果这类带有污名化和压力的信息方面仍然存在困难,尤其是对于那些使用甲基苯丙胺或处于社会经济脆弱状态的人,以及那些有艾滋病毒检测呈阳性的性伴侣且可能怀疑自己检测结果呈阳性的人。需要制定针对性的策略,以便更好地将这些人群纳入无歧视的艾滋病毒护理连续统一体中。