• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型机械瓣膜与带支架生物瓣膜用于65岁以上患者单纯二尖瓣置换术的比较

Comparison of a novel mechanical valve versus stented bioprosthetic valves for isolated mitral valve replacement in patients older than 65 years.

作者信息

Piperata Antonio, Mariani Carlo, Murana Giacomo, Fabbri Elio, Rucci Paola, Scuppa Maria Francesca, Londi Filippo, Bianco Edoardo, Guerrini Benedetta, Tammaro Ivan, Fabiani Ludovica, Careddu Margherita, Bellomare Marta, Snaidero Silvia, Nania Riccardo, Castagnini Sabrina, Di Carlo Marta, Orioli Valentina, Folesani Gianluca, Pacini Davide

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2025 Jun 26;26:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.015. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.015
PMID:40923067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414396/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare early and long-term clinical outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical (On-X) mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients aged 65 years and older.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients equal to or older than 65 years underwent isolated MVR from 2005 to 2023. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare early- and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with bioprostheses and mechanical On-X valve.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients were included, of whom 232 (70.3%) experienced bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (BMVR group) and 98 (29.7%) mechanical mitral valve replacement (MMVR group) with On-X prosthesis. Propensity score analysis allowed to match 98 patients from each group. In the matched cohorts, the overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.7%, 86.5%, and 69.5% for the MMVR group and 89.6%, 80.8%, and 62.5% for the BMVR (log-rank test: 1.88, = .170). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from reoperation, endocarditis, pacemaker implantation, and hemorrhagic events were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients older than 65 years requiring isolated MVR, the use of On-X mechanical prosthesis showed comparable long-term outcomes over bioprostheses.

摘要

目的

比较65岁及以上患者生物瓣与机械瓣(On-X)二尖瓣置换术(MVR)的早期和长期临床结果。

方法

这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2005年至2023年期间连续接受单纯MVR且年龄在65岁及以上的患者。进行倾向评分匹配分析,以比较生物瓣和机械On-X瓣患者的早期和长期临床结果。

结果

共纳入330例患者,其中232例(70.3%)接受生物瓣二尖瓣置换术(BMVR组),98例(29.7%)接受On-X机械瓣二尖瓣置换术(MMVR组)。倾向评分分析使每组匹配98例患者。在匹配队列中,MMVR组1年、5年和10年的总生存率分别为97.7%、86.5%和69.5%,BMVR组分别为89.6%、80.8%和62.5%(对数秩检验:1.88,P = 0.170)。两组在1年、5年和10年免于再次手术、心内膜炎、起搏器植入和出血事件的情况相当。

结论

在年龄大于65岁需要单纯MVR的患者中,使用On-X机械瓣与生物瓣相比,长期结果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/319e459ed766/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/3b70507bf92f/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/cd3234bde53c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/76aec4a1d3a1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/319e459ed766/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/3b70507bf92f/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/cd3234bde53c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/76aec4a1d3a1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abe/12414396/319e459ed766/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of a novel mechanical valve versus stented bioprosthetic valves for isolated mitral valve replacement in patients older than 65 years.新型机械瓣膜与带支架生物瓣膜用于65岁以上患者单纯二尖瓣置换术的比较
JTCVS Open. 2025 Jun 26;26:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.015. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement in dialysis patients: evidence from a nationwide database.透析患者二尖瓣置换术的长期结果:来自全国数据库的证据。
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3778-3787. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000684.
3
Age-Based Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valves.基于生物瓣与机械瓣的主动脉瓣置换术后年龄相关的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement in Rheumatic heart disease: A high-value care systematic review and meta-analysis.风湿性心脏病中二尖瓣修复术与二尖瓣置换术的疗效和安全性比较:一项高价值医疗系统评价与荟萃分析
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Jun;49(6):102530. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102530. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
5
Mechanical or biologic prostheses for mitral valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机械或生物瓣置换二尖瓣:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):701-716. doi: 10.1002/clc.23854. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
6
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement in dialysis patients: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.在透析患者中,主动脉瓣置换的机械瓣与生物瓣:系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2024 Nov;32(8-9):484-493. doi: 10.1177/02184923241301108.
7
Effects of mitral valve disease etiology on the outcomes of mechanical and biological valve replacement: retrospective cohort study.二尖瓣疾病病因对机械瓣和生物瓣置换术结局的影响:回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3495-3503. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001283.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Valve Replacement With Mechanical Prosthesis in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.心脏瓣膜病患者机械瓣膜置换术的长期结局:一项单中心回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 May 22;17(5):e84655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84655. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Tricuspid valve replacement with mechanical versus biological prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.三尖瓣置换术采用机械瓣与生物瓣的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Nov 26;19(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03014-0.
10
Stented Biological Prosthesis Versus Mitral Allograft in Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis.带支架生物瓣膜与二尖瓣同种异体移植在三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎外科治疗中的比较
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 8;26(7):37204. doi: 10.31083/RCM37204. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of a novel mechanical mitral valve prosthesis.一种新型机械二尖瓣假体的中期生存率、临床及血流动力学结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Nov 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.029.
2
Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients.不同年龄组倾向性匹配患者中单纯机械瓣与生物瓣二尖瓣置换术的长期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 1;66(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae245.
3
Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic Valves in the Mitral Position: A Pooled Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Individual Patient Data.
二尖瓣位置生物瓣长期结局:重建时间事件个体患者数据的汇总荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jun 15;221:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.008. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Long-term outcomes of bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years.二尖瓣生物瓣长期疗效的系统评价:对过去 20 年发表的研究的综述。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Nov 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad384.
5
Durability of Biological Valves Implanted in Aortic or Mitral Positions: A Nationwide Cohort Study.生物瓣在主动脉瓣或二尖瓣位置的耐久性:一项全国性队列研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Oct;116(4):751-757. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.05.038. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
6
Bioprosthetic vs. Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement for Rheumatic Heart Disease in Patients Aged 50-70 Years.50至70岁风湿性心脏病患者生物瓣膜与机械瓣膜二尖瓣置换术的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 31;9:904958. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.904958. eCollection 2022.
7
Long-term outcomes with the On-X bileaflet mitral valve: clinical events up to 17 years in 661 patients.On-X 双叶二尖瓣的长期结果:661 例患者长达 17 年的临床事件。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Oct 4;62(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac157.
8
Biological or mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients 50-70 years of age-a propensity-adjusted analysis.50-70 岁患者的生物瓣或机械瓣置换术-倾向评分调整分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jul 11;62(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac073.
9
Carpentier-Edwards Magna Ease bioprosthesis: a multicentre clinical experience and 12-year durability.卡彭蒂埃-爱德华兹玛格纳易生物瓣:多中心临床经验和 12 年耐久性。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Mar 24;61(4):888-896. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab552.
10
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.