• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.作为人类受试者的公民科学家:伦理问题。
Citiz Sci. 2019;4(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.150. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Administrative and research policies required to bring cellular therapies from the research laboratory to the patient's bedside.将细胞疗法从研究实验室应用于患者床边所需的管理和研究政策。
Transfusion. 2005 Oct;45(4 Suppl):144S-58S. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00616.x.
9
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Ethical integrity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: challenges, pitfalls, and best practices in ophthalmology.系统评价与荟萃分析中的伦理诚信:眼科领域的挑战、陷阱及最佳实践
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 31;14(2):40-49. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1522. eCollection 2025 Summer.

本文引用的文献

1
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule.《保护人类受试者联邦政策》。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2017 Jan 19;82(12):7149-274.
2
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.公民科学还是科学公民身份?厘清国家研究计划中公众参与言辞的用途。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 4;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1.
3
The Power of Engaging Citizen Scientists for Scientific Progress.让公民科学家参与推动科学进步的力量。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2016 Mar 1;17(1):7-12. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1052. eCollection 2016 Mar.
4
Ethical Issues in Environmental Health Research Related to Public Health Emergencies: Reflections on the GuLF STUDY.与突发公共卫生事件相关的环境卫生研究中的伦理问题:对海湾地区研究的思考
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Sep;123(9):A227-31. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1509889.
5
Monitoring indoor exposure to organophosphate flame retardants: hand wipes and house dust.监测室内有机磷酸酯阻燃剂暴露情况:手部擦拭样本与室内灰尘
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Feb;123(2):160-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408669. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
6
Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.美国研究机构采用的研究不当行为定义。
Account Res. 2015;22(1):14-21. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.891943.
7
Exposures of 129 preschool children to organochlorines, organophosphates, pyrethroids, and acid herbicides at their homes and daycares in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州129名学龄前儿童在其家中和日托中心接触有机氯、有机磷、拟除虫菊酯和酸性除草剂的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Apr 3;11(4):3743-64. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110403743.
8
Community engagement about genetic variation research.社区参与基因变异研究。
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Apr;15(2):78-89. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0013. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
9
Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research.平衡社区参与式研究中的科学和社区利益。
Account Res. 2010 Jul;17(4):198-210. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095.
10
A new dawn for citizen science.公民科学的新曙光。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017. Epub 2009 Jul 6.

作为人类受试者的公民科学家:伦理问题。

Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.

作者信息

Resnik David B

机构信息

National Institute of Environmental Health Science, US.

National Institutes of Health, US.

出版信息

Citiz Sci. 2019;4(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.150. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

DOI:10.5334/cstp.150
PMID:40933648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12419540/
Abstract

An increasing number of human studies are asking participants to have substantial involvement in research. Citizens in human studies may contribute to various research activities, including study design, recruitment, data interpretation, and data and sample collection. Citizen involvement in research raises novel ethical issues for human studies, because individuals have traditionally occupied the role of researcher or subject, but not both at the same time. The confluence of these two different roles in the same person poses challenges for investigators and oversight committees because legal rules and ethical guidelines focus on protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects and do not address issues that fall outside this domain, such as study design, data quality and integrity, reporting misconduct, authorship, or publication. This article examines some of these issues and makes recommendations for investigators and oversight committees.

摘要

越来越多的人体研究要求参与者深度参与研究。人体研究中的公民可能会参与各种研究活动,包括研究设计、招募、数据解读以及数据和样本收集。公民参与研究给人体研究带来了新的伦理问题,因为传统上个人要么扮演研究者的角色,要么扮演受试者的角色,不会同时兼具这两种角色。同一个人兼具这两种不同角色给研究者和监督委员会带来了挑战,因为法律规则和伦理准则侧重于保护人类受试者的权利和福祉,并未涉及该领域之外的问题,如研究设计、数据质量与完整性、报告不当行为、署名权或发表问题。本文探讨了其中一些问题,并为研究者和监督委员会提出了建议。