Di Palo Maria Pia, Di Spirito Federica, Garofano Marina, Del Sorbo Rosaria, Caggiano Mario, Giordano Francesco, Bartolomeo Marianna, Pessolano Colomba, Giordano Massimo, Amato Massimo, Bramanti Alessia
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 26;13(17):2125. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172125.
The World Health Organization defined specific recommendations about digital tobacco cessation modalities as a self-management tool or as an adjunct to other support for adults. : The present umbrella review primarily aimed to assess the long-term (≥6 months) effectiveness and adherence of the different standalone digital tobacco cessation modalities (mobile text messaging, smartphone apps, Internet-based websites and programs, AI-based), administered individually or in combination; secondarily, the study aimed to assess the effect on smokers' health. : The present study (PROSPERO number: CRD42024601824) followed the PRISMA guidelines. The included studies were qualitatively synthesized and evaluated through the AMSTAR-2 tool. : Forty-five systematic reviews were included, encompassing 164,010 adult daily smokers of combustible tobacco. At 6 months, highly interactive or human-centered digital tools showed higher effectiveness (biochemically verified continuous abstinence rates (CARs) were 11.48% for smartphone apps and 11.76% for video/telephone counseling). In contrast, at 12 months, simpler, less interactive tools demonstrated higher effectiveness (self-reported CARs was 24.38% for mobile text messaging and 18.98% for Internet-based). Adherence rates were generally high, particularly with human-centered digital tools, amounting to 94.12% at 6 months and 64.08% at 12 months. Compared with individually administered digital tobacco cessation modalities, at 12 months, combined ones registered slightly higher effectiveness (self-reported CARs were 13.12% vs. 13.94%) and adherence (62.36% vs. 63.70%), potentially attributed to the multi-component nature and longer durations. : Clinicians should prioritize combined digital tobacco cessation interventions that incorporate human-centered engagement initially, alongside simpler, sustained digital support to enhance long-term effectiveness and adherence. Future research should explore long-term medical and oral health benefits to assess the impact on overall health and well-being.
世界卫生组织针对数字戒烟方式制定了具体建议,将其作为一种自我管理工具或作为对成年人其他支持的辅助手段。:本伞状综述主要旨在评估不同的独立数字戒烟方式(手机短信、智能手机应用程序、基于互联网的网站和项目、基于人工智能的方式)单独或联合使用时的长期(≥6个月)有效性和依从性;其次,该研究旨在评估对吸烟者健康的影响。:本研究(PROSPERO编号:CRD42024601824)遵循PRISMA指南。纳入的研究通过AMSTAR-2工具进行定性综合和评估。:纳入了45项系统评价,涉及164,010名成年每日可燃烟草吸烟者。在6个月时,高度互动或以人为本的数字工具显示出更高的有效性(智能手机应用程序的生化验证持续戒烟率(CARs)为11.48%,视频/电话咨询为11.76%)。相比之下,在12个月时,更简单、互动性更低的工具显示出更高的有效性(手机短信的自我报告CARs为24.38%,基于互联网的为18.98%)。依从率普遍较高,尤其是以人为本的数字工具,6个月时为94.12%,12个月时为64.08%。与单独使用的数字戒烟方式相比,在12个月时,联合使用的方式有效性(自我报告CARs分别为13.12%和13.94%)和依从性(62.36%和63.70%)略高,这可能归因于其多成分性质和更长的持续时间。:临床医生应优先考虑联合数字戒烟干预措施,最初纳入以人为本的参与方式,同时辅以更简单、持续的数字支持,以提高长期有效性和依从性。未来的研究应探索长期的医学和口腔健康益处,以评估对整体健康和幸福的影响。