• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A型急性主动脉夹层修复术后主动脉根部保留的演变:根部残留主动脉夹层的影响

Evolution of Aortic Root Preservation After Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Repair: Impact of Root-Residual Aortic Dissection.

作者信息

Porto Alizee, Court Axel, Barral Pierre Antoine, Boucekine Mohamed, Imbert Laura, Gariboldi Vlad, Jacquier Alexis, Collart Frederic, Theron Alexis, Gaudry Marine

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France.

Department of Radiology, APHM, Timone Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 5;14(17):6274. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176274.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14176274
PMID:40944033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12429438/
Abstract

The management of the aortic root in type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is challenging. Conservative aortic root repair is considered a reasonable option in most cases. This study aimed to analyze medium-term mortality and aortic root reintervention after TAAD. All patients with TAAD underwent prospective follow-ups between 2017 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the increase in aortic root diameter and the rate of proximal root reintervention. The secondary endpoints were the risk factor and location for root-RAD, and risk factors for severe and moderate AR and mortality during follow-up. A total of 210 patients were included, of which 166 (79.0%) did not have root-RAD and 44 (21.0%) had root-RAD after supracoronary aortic replacement. After a mean follow-up of 41.1 months (0-60), four patients (1.8%) died. No cases of aortic root rupture were reported. Two patients in the root-RAD group underwent aortic root reoperation. The aortic root diameter increased by 0.5 mm/year and 0.09 mm/year in the root-RAD and no-root-RAD groups, respectively ( = 0.18). Root-RAD was a risk factor for severe AR (HR 19.6; 95%CI: 1.6-2.7; = 0.05) and an independent risk factor for moderate AR (HR 23.0; 95%CI: 2.8-2.9; = 0.009). Without increasing long-term mortality, root-RAD increases the risks of AR and subsequent aortic root reintervention. Long-term follow-up is essential for monitoring aortic valve function.

摘要

A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)中主动脉根部的管理具有挑战性。在大多数情况下,保守的主动脉根部修复被认为是一种合理的选择。本研究旨在分析TAAD后的中期死亡率和主动脉根部再次干预情况。所有TAAD患者在2017年至2021年期间接受了前瞻性随访。主要终点是主动脉根部直径的增加和近端根部再次干预的发生率。次要终点是根部-RAD的危险因素和位置,以及随访期间严重和中度AR的危险因素和死亡率。共纳入210例患者,其中166例(79.0%)在冠状动脉上主动脉置换术后没有根部-RAD,44例(21.0%)有根部-RAD。平均随访41.1个月(0-60个月)后,4例患者(1.8%)死亡。未报告主动脉根部破裂病例。根部-RAD组中有2例患者接受了主动脉根部再次手术。根部-RAD组和无根部-RAD组的主动脉根部直径分别以每年0.5 mm和每年0.09 mm的速度增加(P = 0.18)。根部-RAD是严重AR的危险因素(HR 19.6;95%CI:1.6-2.7;P = 0.05),也是中度AR的独立危险因素(HR 23.0;95%CI:2.8-2.9;P = 0.009)。根部-RAD在不增加长期死亡率的情况下,增加了AR和随后主动脉根部再次干预的风险。长期随访对于监测主动脉瓣功能至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f16/12429438/c11d7da16323/jcm-14-06274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f16/12429438/0c590b78b40a/jcm-14-06274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f16/12429438/fee1efddf459/jcm-14-06274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f16/12429438/c11d7da16323/jcm-14-06274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f16/12429438/0c590b78b40a/jcm-14-06274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f16/12429438/fee1efddf459/jcm-14-06274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f16/12429438/c11d7da16323/jcm-14-06274-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of Aortic Root Preservation After Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Repair: Impact of Root-Residual Aortic Dissection.A型急性主动脉夹层修复术后主动脉根部保留的演变:根部残留主动脉夹层的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 5;14(17):6274. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176274.
2
Aorto-Right Atrial Fistula Caused by Subacute Type A Aortic Dissection Six Months After Double Valve Replacement: A Case Report and Literature Review.双瓣置换术后六个月由亚急性A型主动脉夹层引起的主动脉-右心房瘘:一例报告及文献复习
Cureus. 2025 Jun 24;17(6):e86692. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86692. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Ascending aortic replacement versus aortic root replacement in patients with type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.升主动脉置换术与主动脉根部置换术治疗累及主动脉根部的A型主动脉夹层患者的比较
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17539447241303408. doi: 10.1177/17539447241303408.
4
-Related Marfan Syndrome-相关马凡综合征
5
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 23;2014(1):CD004178. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004178.pub2.
6
Zone 2 Aortic Arch Repair With Single-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endografts, at Least 3 Years of Follow-up.使用单开窗医生改良型腔内移植物进行主动脉弓2区修复,至少随访3年。
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Oct;32(5):1614-1622. doi: 10.1177/15266028231215779. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
7
Large endograft diameter is associated with poor outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.在医疗保险受益人中,大尺寸的腔内血管修复移植物与胸主动脉瘤腔内修复术后的不良预后相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.030.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Beta-blockers for preventing aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome.β受体阻滞剂预防马凡综合征患者主动脉夹层形成
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 7;11(11):CD011103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011103.pub2.
10
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of aortic root preservation versus root replacement for acute type A aortic dissection: balancing survival, durability, and reoperation.
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2025.05.008.
2
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases.2024年欧洲心脏病学会外周动脉和主动脉疾病管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-3700. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179.
3
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
Long-term outcomes after ascending aortic replacement and aortic root replacement for type A aortic dissection.升主动脉置换术和主动脉根部置换术治疗A型主动脉夹层的长期预后。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 21;34(3):453-461. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab324.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of acute aortic dissections in population-based studies.基于人群的研究中急性主动脉夹层发病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):709-720. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.080. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
7
Results of a prospective follow-up study after type A aortic dissection repair: a high rate of distal aneurysmal evolution and reinterventions.前瞻性研究结果:A型主动脉夹层修复后,远端动脉瘤发生率高,需要再次干预。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 27;61(1):152-159. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab317.
8
Type A acute aortic dissection with ≥40-mm aortic root: results of conservative and replacement strategies at long-term follow-up.A型急性主动脉夹层伴≥40mm 主动脉根部:长期随访中保守和置换策略的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 8;59(5):1115-1122. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa456.
9
Midterm outcomes and durability of sinus segment preservation compared with root replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.窦部节段保存与根部置换治疗急性 A 型主动脉夹层的中期结果和耐久性比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Mar;163(3):900-910.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.064. Epub 2020 May 4.
10
The fate of aortic root and aortic regurgitation after supracoronary ascending aortic replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.急性 A 型主动脉夹层行升主动脉根部替换术后主动脉根部和主动脉瓣反流的转归。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):483-493.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.183. Epub 2019 Dec 12.