Albassal Ahmad, Al-Khanati Nuraldeen Maher, Zenati Mazen
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syria.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Oct;135:111933. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111933. Epub 2025 Sep 10.
After tooth extraction, horizontal bone loss and a reduction in the bucco-lingual ridge dimension may occur. This often necessitates bone augmentation to enable implant placement. For this reason, techniques such as ridge splitting and expansion have been developed; however, they present challenges in single-tooth sites and in the mandible. Complications such as buccal plate fractures remain a concern.
A 49-year-old female, seeking fixed replacement of a missing mandibular molar, presented with a narrow alveolar ridge at the extraction site. Alveolar ridge splitting and expansion were performed to facilitate simultaneous implant placement. During the procedure, a buccal plate fracture occurred. Management did not involve plate fixation; instead, the resulting gap was filled with bone graft. Four months after the procedure, a significant net horizontal bone gain of 3.6 mm was observed. A follow-up at 10 months post-surgery showed successful clinical and radiographic results for both the implant and the prosthetic restoration.
A buccal bone fracture occurred during implant placement following ridge splitting. Such fractures can result from mechanical stress exceeding the bone's structural integrity, particularly after splitting and expansion procedures. The mandibular buccal cortical plate is more susceptible to fracture. Management typically involves rigid fixation of the fractured plate with screws, especially in cases of complete fractures. In this report, bone grafting alone was sufficient. The fracture was incomplete, so no fixation was needed. The wound was securely sutured, which allowed for predictable graft containment and healing.
Alveolar ridge splitting is an effective technique for managing narrow ridges and facilitating implant placement. However, complications such as buccal plate fractures may occur. Non-fixation can be considered a viable management strategy in cases where the fracture is incomplete, stable, and soft tissue closure is secure and free of tension. Despite potential challenges, alveolar split can be performed in mandibular single-tooth sites. Careful follow-up is crucial to ensure predictable healing.
拔牙后,可能会出现水平骨吸收以及颊舌侧牙槽嵴尺寸减小的情况。这通常需要进行骨增量以实现种植体植入。因此,已开发出诸如牙槽嵴劈开和扩张等技术;然而,它们在单颗牙部位和下颌骨中存在挑战。诸如颊侧骨板骨折等并发症仍是一个问题。
一名49岁女性,寻求固定修复缺失的下颌磨牙,其拔牙部位的牙槽嵴狭窄。进行了牙槽嵴劈开和扩张以利于同期种植体植入。手术过程中发生了颊侧骨板骨折。处理措施未涉及骨板固定;相反,所形成的间隙用骨移植材料填充。术后4个月,观察到水平骨净增量达3.6毫米。术后10个月的随访显示种植体和修复体在临床和影像学上均取得成功。
在牙槽嵴劈开后植入种植体过程中发生了颊侧骨骨折。此类骨折可能是由于机械应力超过了骨的结构完整性,尤其是在劈开和扩张手术后。下颌颊侧皮质骨板更容易发生骨折。处理通常包括用螺钉对骨折骨板进行坚固固定,尤其是在完全骨折的情况下。在本报告中,仅骨移植就足够了。骨折为不完全骨折,因此无需固定。伤口严密缝合,这使得移植材料能够得到可预测的容纳并实现愈合。
牙槽嵴劈开是处理狭窄牙槽嵴并促进种植体植入的有效技术。然而,可能会发生诸如颊侧骨板骨折等并发症。在骨折不完全、稳定且软组织闭合安全且无张力的情况下,可不进行固定,这可被视为一种可行的处理策略。尽管存在潜在挑战,但牙槽嵴劈开可在下颌单颗牙部位进行。仔细的随访对于确保可预测的愈合至关重要。