Coppola Silvia, Pastene Bruno, Fratti Isabella, Sentürk Mert, Emre Demirel Ebru, Leone Marc, Chiumello Davide Alberto
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital, Via Di Rudinì 9, Milan, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Adv Ther. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03369-3.
Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) are commonly used in thoracic surgery, yet postoperative complications still occur in up to 10% of the patients. The aim of our narrative review was to summarize the best available evidence on mechanical ventilation settings, particularly with regard positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection, tidal volume (VT) and ventilation mode, as well as the feasibility of two-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery using VATS or RATS techniques. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed database using the terms "VATS" or "RATS" and "ventilation" between 1 January 2007 and 1 February 2025. Publications were screened by title or abstract. We discussed studies according to their methodological quality, ventilation mode, as well as the feasibility of two-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery using VATS or RATS techniques. In patients receiving one-lung ventilation (OLV), the application of a protective lung ventilation using an intermediate VT ranged between 5 and 8 ml (mL) of predicted body weight (PBW) and a PEEP of 5-8 cmHO was not found to be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and improved hospital outcomes. Titrating PEEP based on mechanical properties appears to enhance perioperative oxygenation and ventilatory mechanics and to reduce postoperative pneumonia. However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding ventilation modes, because only few studies have compared the same low VT using different pressure versus volume control modes. The feasibility of two-lung ventilation during specific thoracic surgery procedures has recently been positively evaluated, with no differences in postoperative complications found. The level of evidence for the ventilatory settings in patients undergoing VATS or RATS remains low. In conclusion, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to determine whether certain intraoperative ventilatory strategies can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients.
电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)和机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)在胸外科手术中常用,但仍有高达10%的患者术后出现并发症。我们叙述性综述的目的是总结关于机械通气设置的最佳现有证据,特别是关于呼气末正压(PEEP)选择、潮气量(VT)和通气模式,以及使用VATS或RATS技术进行胸外科手术的患者双肺通气的可行性。我们在2007年1月1日至2025年2月1日期间使用“VATS”或“RATS”以及“通气”等术语在MEDLINE/PubMed数据库中进行检索。通过标题或摘要对出版物进行筛选。我们根据研究的方法学质量、通气模式以及使用VATS或RATS技术进行胸外科手术的患者双肺通气的可行性对研究进行了讨论。在接受单肺通气(OLV)的患者中,未发现应用中等VT(预测体重(PBW)的5至8 ml/kg)和5 - 8 cmH₂O的PEEP的保护性肺通气与较低的术后肺部并发症发生率及改善的住院结局相关。根据力学特性滴定PEEP似乎可增强围手术期氧合和通气力学,并减少术后肺炎。然而,关于通气模式无法得出结论,因为只有少数研究比较了使用不同压力与容量控制模式的相同低VT。最近对特定胸外科手术过程中双肺通气的可行性进行了积极评估,未发现术后并发症有差异。VATS或RATS患者通气设置的证据水平仍然较低。总之,需要大型随机对照试验(RCT)来确定某些术中通气策略是否能降低患者术后肺部并发症(PPCs)。