Barbato Raffaele, Ferraresi Benedetto, Chello Massimo, Strumia Alessandro, Gagliardi Ilaria, Loreni Francesco, Mattei Alessia, Santarpino Giuseppe, Carassiti Massimiliano, Grigioni Francesco, Lusini Mario
Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Sep 16;14(9):934. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14090934.
Infections following cardiac surgery are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). The role of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) and other nosocomial infections is crucial; however, the optimal approach to agent selection, dosing, and duration remains controversial.
This narrative review aims to summarise the current evidence and expert recommendations regarding the use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in adults undergoing cardiac surgery, with a particular focus on intensive care settings, transplant recipients, and adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
A comprehensive review of recent literature was conducted, focusing on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) principles, microbial epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and practical strategies for tailored prophylaxis in high-risk populations.
Cefazolin remains the first-line agent for most procedures, with vancomycin or clindamycin reserved for patients who are allergic to β-lactams or who are colonised with MRSA. Redosing is recommended in cases of prolonged surgery or cardiopulmonary bypass. Evidence supports limiting prophylaxis to ≤24 h, with a potential extension to 48 h in select high-risk cases; however, continuation beyond this is discouraged due to the risk of resistance. In heart transplantation, multimodal prophylaxis against bacteria, fungi, and viruses is essential but must be tailored to the individual patient. In the ECMO setting, the current evidence does not support the routine administration of prophylaxis (AP), and therapy should be tailored based on pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) changes and the clinical context. A multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach to AP in cardiac surgery is essential. Prophylaxis should be patient-specific, microbiologically guided, and limited in duration to reduce the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms. Integrating antimicrobial stewardship, non-pharmacological measures, and rigorous surveillance is crucial for optimising the prevention of infections in this vulnerable population.
心脏手术后感染是发病和死亡的重要原因,在重症监护病房(ICU)尤为如此。抗生素预防(AP)在预防手术部位感染(SSI)和其他医院感染方面的作用至关重要;然而,药物选择、给药剂量和疗程的最佳方法仍存在争议。
本叙述性综述旨在总结目前关于心脏手术成年患者围手术期抗生素预防(AP)使用的证据和专家建议,特别关注重症监护环境、移植受者以及接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的成年患者。
对近期文献进行全面综述,重点关注药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)原理、微生物流行病学、抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)以及高危人群针对性预防的实用策略。
头孢唑林仍是大多数手术的一线用药,万古霉素或克林霉素用于对β-内酰胺类过敏或感染耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的患者。手术时间延长或进行体外循环时建议重新给药。有证据支持将预防用药限制在≤24小时,在某些高危病例中可延长至48小时;然而,由于存在耐药风险,不建议超过此期限继续用药。在心脏移植中,针对细菌、真菌和病毒的多模式预防至关重要,但必须根据个体患者进行调整。在ECMO环境下,目前的证据不支持常规给予预防用药(AP),治疗应根据药代动力学(PK)/药效学(PD)变化和临床情况进行调整。心脏手术中采用多学科、基于证据的AP方法至关重要。预防应针对患者个体,以微生物学为指导,并限制疗程,以减少多重耐药菌的出现。整合抗菌药物管理、非药物措施和严格监测对于优化这一脆弱人群的感染预防至关重要。