Claydon Matthew H, Faulks Charlie R, Malham Gregory M
Department of Neurosciences, Epworth Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Spine Surgery Research Foundation, Richmond, VIC, Australia.
J Spine Surg. 2025 Sep 30;11(3):652-665. doi: 10.21037/jss-25-8. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
Anterior lumbar spine surgery provides a viable efficacious alternative to traditional posterior approaches. Vascular complications are usually managed with simple open surgical techniques. Rarely, massive venous haemorrhage transpires after a venous injury which may be life-threatening. Advanced endovascular devices and techniques provide alternatives to open surgery for the management of massive venous injury (MVI). The majority of descriptions utilise covered stents which often need to be adapted to the emergent situation and the venous anatomy. We aimed to review the venous anatomy, available endovascular devices, and describe techniques used to manage an MVI encountered during anterior lumbar spine surgery, and propose a staged, systematic approach for its endovascular management. These techniques can be used instead of, or combined with open techniques.
A review of national databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline and Google Scholar) was performed using literature from 2000 to 2024 in English. Keywords included terms "anterior" and "lumbar" and "spine" and "haemorrhage" and "venous injury" and "vascular injury" and "damage control" and "endovascular" and "venous thromboembolism". Studies that described the anatomy, incidence, endovascular surgical techniques, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior lumbar spine surgery were included.
We reviewed the relevant anatomy, patient work-up, lists of useful available endovascular equipment and devices, the stages of management, specific endovascular strategies and techniques, and the post-operative management of the patient.
Endovascular surgery can deliver control and definitive management with lower blood loss, reduced physiological insult while preserving venous patency. It is more likely to permit the completion of the spinal procedure than open surgical repair. Expertise in endovascular techniques is mandatory for their deployment. The best outcome is only achieved with a team approach to the situation, with the recruitment of appropriately skilled personnel and equipment. Endovascular techniques should be included in contingency planning for MVI.
腰椎前路手术为传统后路手术提供了一种可行且有效的替代方案。血管并发症通常采用简单的开放手术技术进行处理。静脉损伤后极少会发生大量静脉出血,这可能危及生命。先进的血管内装置和技术为处理大量静脉损伤(MVI)提供了开放手术之外的替代方法。大多数描述使用覆膜支架,其通常需要根据紧急情况和静脉解剖结构进行调整。我们旨在回顾静脉解剖结构、可用的血管内装置,并描述在腰椎前路手术中处理MVI所使用的技术,并提出一种分阶段、系统的血管内处理方法。这些技术可替代开放技术使用,或与开放技术联合使用。
使用2000年至2024年的英文文献对国家数据库(PubMed、Ovid Medline和谷歌学术)进行了回顾。关键词包括“前路”“腰椎”“脊柱”“出血”“静脉损伤”“血管损伤”“损伤控制”“血管内”“静脉血栓栓塞”。纳入描述腰椎前路手术的解剖结构、发生率、血管内手术技术、并发症、临床和影像学结果的研究。
我们回顾了相关解剖结构、患者检查、可用的有用血管内设备和装置清单、处理阶段、特定的血管内策略和技术以及患者的术后管理。
血管内手术能够在控制出血、减少生理损伤的同时保持静脉通畅,实现确定性处理。与开放手术修复相比,它更有可能使脊柱手术得以完成。血管内技术的专业知识对于其应用至关重要。只有通过团队协作,配备适当技能的人员和设备,才能取得最佳结果。血管内技术应纳入MVI的应急计划中。