Dai Zhichu, Zhang Sisen, Wang Hongyu, He Liwei, Liao Jiankun, Wu Xuanyu
The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, P.R. China.
Affiliated Zhengzhou People's Hospital, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, P.R. China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Nov 11;15(1):39492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-22998-w.
Active abdominal compression-decompression resuscitation (AACD-CPR) has been proposed as an alternative to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) for cases of multiple rib fractures with asphyxial cardiac arrest (CA), yet its underlying hemodynamic effects remain unclear. In this study, thirty-eight rats underwent bilateral rib fracture modeling, with thirty successfully modeled and then randomly assigned to the AACD-CPR, STD-CPR, or sham groups (n = 10 each). After surgical procedures, rats experienced 8 min of asphyxia followed by assigned CPR, or no intervention in the sham group. Hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters were measured at multiple time points during and after resuscitation, and rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) as well as cumulative 240-minute survival were recorded. AACD-CPR resulted in lower right atrial diastolic pressure during resuscitation and less severe acidosis at 30 min post-resuscitation compared to STD-CPR, although other hemodynamic and outcome measures did not differ significantly between the two resuscitation techniques. These findings suggest that AACD-CPR can achieve similar hemodynamic performance and survival outcomes to STD-CPR in a rat model of multiple rib fractures causing asphyxial cardiac arrest, supporting its potential as an alternative when conventional chest compressions are compromised.
主动腹部按压-减压复苏术(AACD-CPR)已被提议作为标准心肺复苏术(STD-CPR)的替代方法,用于治疗因窒息性心脏骤停(CA)导致多根肋骨骨折的病例,但其潜在的血流动力学效应仍不清楚。在本研究中,38只大鼠接受双侧肋骨骨折建模,其中30只建模成功,然后随机分为AACD-CPR组、STD-CPR组或假手术组(每组n = 10)。手术后,大鼠经历8分钟窒息,然后进行指定的心肺复苏,假手术组不进行干预。在复苏期间和复苏后的多个时间点测量血流动力学和动脉血气参数,并记录自主循环恢复(ROSC)率以及240分钟累计生存率。与STD-CPR相比,AACD-CPR在复苏期间导致右心房舒张压较低,复苏后30分钟时酸中毒较轻,尽管两种复苏技术之间的其他血流动力学和结果指标没有显著差异。这些发现表明,在因窒息性心脏骤停导致多根肋骨骨折的大鼠模型中,AACD-CPR可以实现与STD-CPR相似的血流动力学性能和生存结果,支持其在传统胸外按压受到影响时作为替代方法的潜力。