David O J, Clark J, Hoffman S
Arch Environ Health. 1979 Mar-Apr;34(2):106-11. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1979.10667378.
Long recognized as an environmental toxin of fearsome lethality, lead effects are commonly described as extremely serious, particularly as regards the central nervous system. It is postulated here that this represents only part of the pathologic spectrum. Ohter lead-related conditions, as yet unrecognized, may include a wide range of central nervous system dysfunctions that although severe, are not so acutely dramatic or widely destructive as the classic encephalopathic or preencephalopathic states. These conditions remain etiologically unrecognized primarily because of (1) the variable nature of onset, (2) the variable nature of the manifestations, (3) the relative subtlety of the dysfunctions, and most importantly, (4) the absence of consistant, unequivocal evidence demonstrating the relationship of lower blood lead levels with pathologic effects. This last is seen as pivotal, and an extensive examination of the reasons for its absence is presented. It is postulated that biological variability, a concept widely used in medicine but rarely invoked in the researching of lead toxicity, is a crucial ingredient in lead research. It is further asserted that the grevious lack of etiologic recognition will continue until that factor is incorporated into research designs.
长期以来,铅一直被视为一种具有可怕致死性的环境毒素,其影响通常被描述为极其严重,尤其是对中枢神经系统而言。本文推测这仅仅代表了病理谱的一部分。其他与铅相关的状况,目前尚未被认识到,可能包括一系列中枢神经系统功能障碍,这些功能障碍虽然严重,但不像典型的脑病或前驱脑病状态那样具有急性的戏剧性或广泛的破坏性。这些状况在病因上尚未被认识到,主要是因为:(1)发病的多变性;(2)表现的多变性;(3)功能障碍相对细微;最重要的是,(4)缺乏一致、明确的证据证明较低的血铅水平与病理效应之间的关系。最后一点被视为关键,本文对其缺失的原因进行了广泛探讨。本文推测,生物变异性这一在医学中广泛使用但在铅毒性研究中很少被提及的概念,是铅研究的关键要素。进一步断言,在将该因素纳入研究设计之前,病因识别方面的严重不足将持续存在。