Courbier R, Reggi M, Jausseran J M
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1979 May-Jun;20(3):333-7.
Out of a total of more than 1,200 patients in whom lumbar sympathectomy was carried out, two groups of 96 and 50 consecutive and non selected patients were evaluated before and after the operation by non invasive physiologic tests (digital plethysmography, post-occlusive reactive hyperemia, segmental blood pressure at rest and after exercise, Strandness test). Results were compared with angiography and clinical data. The statistical study of results corroborates the following points. 1. Lumbar sympathectomy is essentially effective in atherosclerotic arterial disease, but much less so in diabetic patients and in cases of widespread disease. 2. Patients with obstructive disease of the femoral artery had more improvement (t = 4.25) than patients with obstruction of peripheral arteries (t = 2.4). 3. Walking time was significantly improved after sympathectomy (p = 0.02). 4. Only one parameter, rheographic quotient Rq was statistically improved (p = 0.01). 5. The post occlusive reactive hyperemia test is a good method to predict the results of lumbar sympathectomy (correlation r = 0.22). We feel that this operation is indicated in cases of: isolated obstruction of the femoral artery with claudication superior to 200 meters, reconstruction with an associated obstruction of the superficial femoral artery.
在总共超过1200例行腰交感神经切除术的患者中,两组分别为96例和50例连续且未经过挑选的患者,在手术前后通过无创生理测试(数字体积描记法、闭塞后反应性充血、静息及运动后的节段性血压、斯特兰德尼斯试验)进行评估。结果与血管造影及临床数据进行比较。结果的统计学研究证实了以下几点。1. 腰交感神经切除术对动脉粥样硬化性动脉疾病基本有效,但对糖尿病患者及疾病广泛的病例效果要差得多。2. 股动脉阻塞性疾病患者的改善程度(t = 4.25)高于外周动脉阻塞患者(t = 2.4)。3. 交感神经切除术后步行时间有显著改善(p = 0.02)。4. 只有一个参数,即血流图商Rq有统计学意义的改善(p = 0.01)。5. 闭塞后反应性充血试验是预测腰交感神经切除术结果的良好方法(相关性r = 0.22)。我们认为,在以下情况下可进行该手术:股动脉孤立性阻塞且跛行距离超过200米,合并股浅动脉阻塞时进行重建。