Suppr超能文献

作为精神病指标的罗夏测验发展水平和形式水平系统的比较。

A comparison of Rorschach developmental level and form-level systems as indicators of psychosis.

作者信息

Harder D W, Ritzler B A

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1979 Aug;43(4):347-54. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4304_2.

Abstract

Psychotic and nonpsychotic psychiatric inpatients were tested on the Rorschach. "Reality-testing" was measured by four form-level scoring systems designed by Beck, Mayman, Becker, and Wilensky. The psychotic subjects were dichotomized on three diagnostic dimensions: schizophrenia, paranoia, and premorbid social adjustment. No significant differences were found for the Beck system. With the other systems, psychotics showed significantly poorer reality testing than nonpsychotics. No differences were found for the schizophrenic and paranoid dimensions. The Phillips premorbid adjustment score was negatively correlated with all four measures of "reality-testing." The conclusion drawn was that Rorschach measures of "reality testing" are associated with psychotic and poor premorbid functioning, but do not differentiate schizophrenic from nonschizophrenic psychotics or paranoid schizophrenics from nonparanoid schizophrenics.

摘要

对患有精神病和非精神病的住院精神病人进行了罗夏墨迹测验。“现实检验”通过贝克、梅曼、贝克尔和威伦斯基设计的四个形式水平评分系统来衡量。将患有精神病的受试者在三个诊断维度上进行二分:精神分裂症、偏执狂和病前社会适应情况。在贝克系统中未发现显著差异。在其他系统中,患有精神病的人在现实检验方面明显比没有精神病的人差。在精神分裂症和偏执狂维度上未发现差异。菲利普斯病前适应评分与所有四个“现实检验”指标呈负相关。得出的结论是,罗夏墨迹测验的“现实检验”指标与精神病和病前功能不良有关,但无法区分精神分裂症患者与非精神分裂症患者的精神病患者,也无法区分偏执型精神分裂症患者与非偏执型精神分裂症患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验