Mauderly J L, Tesarek J E, Sifford L J, Sifford L J
Lab Anim Sci. 1979 Jun;29(3):323-9.
The respiratory frequency, tidal volume, minute volume, oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide output of unsedated hamsters, rats, guinea pigs and rabbits were measured to obtain comparative data and to evaluate the performance of those species as unsedated subjects. The animals were trained to remain stationary and breathe through nonrebreathing valves while expired gas was collected and respiratory frequency was monitored. Measurements of dogs also were conducted to obtained comparative data by similar methods. Hamsters were readily trained and performed reliably during repeated trials. Rats and guinea pigs were more difficult to train and performed erratically. The rabbits' performance was intermediate between that of hamsters and the other species. The back pressures caused by the small animal nonrebreathing valves at estimated peak flow rates were either similar to or less than those encountered by dogs. Measured respiratory values were compared to values predicted by published equations based on body weight. Data from this study generally reflected species differences related to body weight and metabolic rate similar to those predicted by the equations, but values from the four smaller species also may have reflected differences related to behavior.
测量了未使用镇静剂的仓鼠、大鼠、豚鼠和兔子的呼吸频率、潮气量、分钟通气量、摄氧量和二氧化碳排出量,以获取比较数据,并评估这些物种作为未使用镇静剂的实验对象的表现。训练动物保持静止,并通过无重复呼吸阀呼吸,同时收集呼出气体并监测呼吸频率。还通过类似方法对狗进行测量以获取比较数据。仓鼠很容易训练,并且在重复试验中表现可靠。大鼠和豚鼠更难训练,表现不稳定。兔子的表现介于仓鼠和其他物种之间。小动物无重复呼吸阀在估计的峰值流速下产生的背压与狗所遇到的背压相似或更低。将测量的呼吸值与基于体重的已发表方程式预测的值进行比较。本研究的数据总体上反映了与体重和代谢率相关的物种差异,与方程式预测的差异相似,但四个较小物种的值也可能反映了与行为相关的差异。