Suppr超能文献

房室缺损的心血管造影表现,特别提及原发孔型房间隔缺损与共同房室口的鉴别。

Angiocardiographic appearances of atrioventricular defects with particular reference to distinction of ostium primum atrial septal defect from common atrioventricular orifice.

作者信息

Macartney F J, Rees P G, Daly K, Piccoli G P, Taylor J F, De Leval M R, Stark J, Anderson R H

出版信息

Br Heart J. 1979 Dec;42(6):640-56. doi: 10.1136/hrt.42.6.640.

Abstract

Preoperative distinction between common atrioventricular orifice and ostium primum atrial septal defect may be difficult. To improve diagnostic accuracy, the right and left ventricle angiocardiograms were reviewed 'blind' in 92 patients with atrioventricular defects. The true diagnosis was known from necropsy or surgery in 60. Angiocardiograms had been obtained in various projections with or without craniocaudal tilt. Those features thought to distinguish between common orifice and ostium primum were coded, together with the ventricular systolic pressures. Computerised disciminant function analysis identified the following distinguishing features: (1) right ventricular systolic pressure; (2) immediate right ventricular outflow tract opacification from the left ventricle; (3) identification of the anterior attachment of the mitral component; (4) recognition of a single straddling atrioventricular orifice; (5) passage of contrast medium above or below the anterior or posterior bridging leaflets. Feature (3) indicates that in contrast to classic teaching the direct septal attachment of the mitral component does not contribute to the 'gooseneck' in complete atrioventricular defects. The significance of (4) and (5) is that they may be identified from right as well as left ventriculography, and are more likely to be identified in oblique than standard projections. Computerisation produced a correct diagnosis in 92 per cent of known cases, and determined precise probabilities of diagnosis in the remainder.

摘要

术前区分共同房室口和原发孔型房间隔缺损可能存在困难。为提高诊断准确性,对92例房室缺损患者的左右心室心血管造影进行了“盲法”回顾。60例患者的真实诊断可通过尸检或手术得知。心血管造影已在不同投照角度下获取,有或没有头脚位倾斜。那些被认为可区分共同口和原发孔的特征,以及心室收缩压,都进行了编码。计算机判别函数分析确定了以下区分特征:(1)右心室收缩压;(2)左心室造影剂立即使右心室流出道显影;(3)识别二尖瓣成分的前附着点;(4)识别单一跨立的房室口;(5)造影剂在前或后桥瓣叶上方或下方通过。特征(3)表明,与传统观点不同,二尖瓣成分的直接间隔附着在完全性房室缺损中对“鹅颈征”并无影响。特征(4)和(5)的意义在于,它们可通过右心室造影以及左心室造影识别,并且在斜位投照中比标准投照中更易识别。计算机分析在92%的已知病例中做出了正确诊断,并确定了其余病例的精确诊断概率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/564d/482217/fc780b66cb1a/brheartj00214-0023-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验