Kendall P C, Deardorff P A, Finch A J, Graham L
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00917601.
In order to determine the interpersonal distancing requirements for emotionally disturbed and normal children and in order to investigate the relationship of locus of control and anxiety to interpersonal space, 20 emotionally disturbed and 20 normal boys were randomly required to approach an object person and to let the object person approach them until they felt uncomfortable. Results indicated that emotionally disturbed boys required more space than normals; that subjects would approach closer than they would allow the object person to approach them; and that externals required more space than internals. There were no significant differences between high and low anxious subjects, nor between emotionally disturbed children diagnostically classified as overanxious reaction and those with other diagnosis. Finally, neither anxiety nor locus of control explained the significant normal-emotionally disturbed differences in space requirements. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed as well as the relationship between the present and previous research.
为了确定情绪失调儿童和正常儿童的人际距离要求,并研究控制点和焦虑与人际空间的关系,随机要求20名情绪失调男孩和20名正常男孩接近一个目标人物,并让目标人物接近他们,直到他们感到不舒服。结果表明,情绪失调男孩比正常男孩需要更多空间;受试者会比他们允许目标人物接近的距离更靠近目标人物;外控型受试者比内控型受试者需要更多空间。高焦虑和低焦虑受试者之间、诊断为过度焦虑反应的情绪失调儿童与其他诊断的情绪失调儿童之间没有显著差异。最后,焦虑和控制点都无法解释正常儿童和情绪失调儿童在空间要求上的显著差异。文中讨论了理论和实际意义,以及当前研究与以往研究的关系。