Henderson A S, Hartigan J, Davidson J, Lance G N, Duncan-Jones P, Koller K M, Ritchie K, McAuley H, Williams C L, Slaghuis W
Br J Psychiatry. 1977 Dec;131:631-41. doi: 10.1192/bjp.131.6.631.
Parasuicide is not a single syndrome. Subtypes at present recognized are based largely on clinically derived stereotypes. When considering a series of patients, the clinician is unable to handle more than a few attributes at a time. This paper describes the application of three very different clustering algorithms to a material of 350 treated parasuicide patients. Mathematically, three types emerge. Clinically, two of these are interpretable and make sense. The types established are: I (n = 107) a group not characterized by any of the variables we examined; this group is a puzzle, mainly because the reasons for the parasuicidal act are not clear. II (n = 132) a depressed, alienated group with high life-endangerment. III (n = III) a group whose act was highly operant: they felt alienated and were angry with others. These groups did not differ significantly on demographic variables. The usefulness of this typology, particularly for management, after-care and prevention, has now to be assessed.
准自杀并非单一综合征。目前所认可的亚型很大程度上基于临床得出的刻板印象。在考量一系列患者时,临床医生一次无法处理多个属性。本文描述了三种截然不同的聚类算法应用于350例接受治疗的准自杀患者资料的情况。从数学角度来看,出现了三种类型。从临床角度而言,其中两种是可解释且合理的。所确定的类型为:I组(n = 107),该组未表现出我们所考察的任何变量特征;此组是个谜题,主要是因为准自杀行为的原因不明。II组(n = 132),一个抑郁、疏离且有高生命危险的组。III组(n = 111),其行为具有高度操作性的组:他们感到疏离且对他人愤怒。这些组在人口统计学变量上无显著差异。这种分类法的实用性,尤其是在管理、后续护理和预防方面的实用性,现在有待评估。