Mayou R, MacMahon D, Sleight P, Florencio M J
Lancet. 1981;2(8260-61):1399-402. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92811-7.
129 men aged 60 years or less with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction were allocated to one of three programmes of management: normal treatment (control), exercise training, or extra advice. Outcome was evaluated after twelve weeks by exercise testing and standardised assessments of psychological state and social adjustment. There were no differences between the groups in psychological outcome, physical activity, or satisfaction with leisure or work. The "exercise" patients were more enthusiastic about their treatment and achieved higher work levels on exercise testing than the "advice" or "control" groups. Those who did not attend had a significantly worse outcome. At eighteen months the only significant findings were better outcomes, in terms of overall satisfaction, hours at work, and frequency of sexual intercourse, for the "advice" group. Exercise training increased confidence during exercise in the early stages of convalescence but the overall results show that rehabilitation is of little benefit to cardiac function, everyday life, or emotional state.
129名年龄在60岁及以下且被诊断为心肌梗死的男性被分配到三种治疗方案之一:常规治疗(对照组)、运动训练或额外建议。在12周后,通过运动测试以及对心理状态和社会适应的标准化评估来评估结果。在心理结果、身体活动或对休闲或工作的满意度方面,各组之间没有差异。“运动”组的患者对治疗更有热情,在运动测试中达到的工作水平高于“建议”组或“对照组”。未参加治疗的患者结果明显更差。在18个月时,唯一显著的发现是“建议”组在总体满意度、工作时长和性交频率方面有更好的结果。运动训练在康复早期增加了运动时的信心,但总体结果表明,康复对心脏功能、日常生活或情绪状态益处不大。