Elliott H L, Meredith P A, Sumner D J, Reid J L
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984 May;17(5):573-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02392.x.
The pharmacokinetics of medroxalol are described in normal subjects and compared with those of labetalol. Both drugs were administered in doses of 400 mg orally and 1 mg/kg intravenously. The data for both drugs was most appropriately described by a two compartment model. For oral medroxalol the clinical pharmacokinetic parameters were a terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2,Z) of 15.6 h, a peak level of 450 ng/ml and a time to peak of 2-3 h. Following intravenous medroxalol the bioavailability was calculated as 64%, the plasma clearance was 948 ml/min and the t 1/2,Z was 7.3 h. The t 1/2,Z following intravenous administration was significantly shorter than that following oral administration. The significant differences between medroxalol and labetalol were in time to peak, respectively 2.3 and 1.1 h; oral t 1/2,Z, 15.6 and 5.5 h; clearance 948 and 1560 ml/min; and bioavailability, 64 and 20%. Despite the pharmacokinetic differences a similar plasma concentration-hypotensive effect relationship was described for each drug.
在正常受试者中描述了美多心安的药代动力学,并与拉贝洛尔的药代动力学进行了比较。两种药物均口服400mg和静脉注射1mg/kg给药。两种药物的数据最适合用二室模型描述。对于口服美多心安,临床药代动力学参数为终末消除半衰期(t1/2,Z)15.6小时,峰值水平450ng/ml,达峰时间2 - 3小时。静脉注射美多心安后,生物利用度计算为64%,血浆清除率为948ml/min,t1/2,Z为7.3小时。静脉给药后的t1/2,Z明显短于口服给药后的t1/2,Z。美多心安和拉贝洛尔之间的显著差异在于达峰时间,分别为2.3小时和1.1小时;口服t1/2,Z,分别为15.6小时和5.5小时;清除率分别为948ml/min和1560ml/min;生物利用度分别为64%和20%。尽管药代动力学存在差异,但每种药物的血浆浓度 - 降压作用关系相似。