Broxmeyer H E, Lu L, Platzer E, Feit C, Juliano L, Rubin B Y
J Immunol. 1983 Sep;131(3):1300-5.
Preparations of human interferon (HuIFN) immune (gamma) (2 X 10(7) units/mg protein), HuIFN leukocyte (alpha) (1.4 X 10(8) units/mg protein) and HuIFN fibroblasts (beta) (10(6) U/mg protein) were assessed for their influence on colony formation of human hematopoietic progenitor cells: colony forming unit-granulocyte, erythroid, macrophage, megakaryocyte (CFU-GEMM), burst forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E), day 7 colony forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and day 14 CFU-GM. Colony formation by CFU-GEMM and BFU-E was suppressed equally by the three preparations of HuIFN, but colony formation by CFU-GM was suppressed differentially. CFU-GM were, on the whole, more responsive to HuIFN gamma than HuIFN alpha, and HuIFN beta was least effective. HuIFN alpha, but not HuIFN gamma or HuIFN beta, suppressed colony formation from CFU-GM without also suppressing the total number of colonies plus clusters. This was due to an increase in the numbers of clusters formed in the presence of HuIFN alpha. The suppressive influence on colonies from CFU-GM by the preparations of HuIFN and the enhancement of clusters by HuIFN alpha was apparently equal for colonies and clusters of neutrophils, eosinophils, macrophages and neutrophils plus macrophages. The suppressive effects of HuIFN gamma were inactivated by a monoclonal antibody to HuIFN gamma and the suppressive and enhancing effects of HuIFN alpha were inactivated with a heteroantiserum to HuIFN alpha. Depletion of monocytes, T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes from the target bone marrow cells had no influence on the effects of the preparations of HuIFN. These results demonstrate that the effects of HuIFN gamma and HuIFN alpha are due to the HuIFN themselves and that these actions on the hematopoietic progenitor cells are probably not mediated through monocytes and/or lymphocytes.
对人干扰素(HuIFN)免疫型(γ)(2×10⁷单位/毫克蛋白质)、人干扰素白细胞型(α)(1.4×10⁸单位/毫克蛋白质)和人干扰素成纤维细胞型(β)(10⁶单位/毫克蛋白质)制剂对人造血祖细胞集落形成的影响进行了评估:粒-红-巨噬-巨核细胞集落形成单位(CFU-GEMM)、红系爆式集落形成单位(BFU-E)、第7天粒-巨噬细胞集落形成单位(CFU-GM)和第14天CFU-GM。CFU-GEMM和BFU-E的集落形成受到三种HuIFN制剂同等程度的抑制,但CFU-GM的集落形成受到的抑制存在差异。总体而言,CFU-GM对HuIFNγ的反应比对HuIFNα更敏感,而HuIFNβ的效果最差。HuIFNα可抑制CFU-GM的集落形成,但不会同时抑制集落加集簇的总数。这是由于在HuIFNα存在的情况下形成的集簇数量增加。HuIFN制剂对CFU-GM集落的抑制作用以及HuIFNα对集簇的增强作用,对于中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、巨噬细胞以及中性粒细胞加巨噬细胞的集落和集簇而言显然是相同的。HuIFNγ的抑制作用可被抗HuIFNγ单克隆抗体灭活,HuIFNα的抑制和增强作用可被抗HuIFNα异种抗血清灭活。从靶骨髓细胞中去除单核细胞、T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞对HuIFN制剂的作用没有影响。这些结果表明,HuIFNγ和HuIFNα的作用是由HuIFN本身引起的,并且这些对造血祖细胞的作用可能不是通过单核细胞和/或淋巴细胞介导的。