Baird I M
Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Mar-Apr;5 Suppl 1:S165-72. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_1.s165.
Cefoperazone was evaluated for efficacy and safety in the treatment of known or suspected intraabdominal infections. Initially, 59 patients were enrolled in an open, noncomparative study. Of the 35 patients in whom the efficacy of treatment could be evaluated, 32 had a satisfactory clinical response. In this open study, cefoperazone eradicated 62 of 71 pathogens. The safety of the drug was evaluated in all 59 patients. Adverse reactions were seen in nine patients. In the second part of the study, 144 patients were enrolled. Fifty-seven of these patients received cefoperazone, 35 received cefamandole, and 52 received clindamycin plus gentamicin. Therapeutic efficacy could be evaluated in 20 patients who received cefoperazone, 20 who received cefamandole, and 16 who received clindamycin-gentamicin. Satisfactory clinical responses were seen in 90%, 80%, and 100% of these patients, respectively; satisfactory bacteriologic responses were seen in 100%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. A 5% incidence of adverse reactions was observed among the 57 patients who received cefoperazone; in contrast, the rate of adverse reaction to cefamandole was 11%, and that to clindamycin-gentamicin was 11.5%. No differences were seen among the patients in the three groups. Thus, cefoperazone appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of intraabdominal infections of bacterial etiology.
对头孢哌酮治疗已知或疑似腹腔内感染的疗效和安全性进行了评估。最初,59例患者参加了一项开放性、非对照研究。在35例可评估治疗效果的患者中,32例有满意的临床反应。在这项开放性研究中,头孢哌酮清除了71种病原体中的62种。对所有59例患者评估了该药物的安全性。9例患者出现了不良反应。在研究的第二部分,纳入了144例患者。其中57例患者接受头孢哌酮治疗,35例接受头孢孟多治疗,52例接受克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗。对20例接受头孢哌酮治疗、20例接受头孢孟多治疗和16例接受克林霉素-庆大霉素治疗的患者评估了治疗效果。这些患者中分别有90%、80%和100%出现了满意的临床反应;分别有100%、95%和100%出现了满意的细菌学反应。在接受头孢哌酮治疗的57例患者中观察到5%的不良反应发生率;相比之下,头孢孟多的不良反应发生率为11%,克林霉素-庆大霉素的不良反应发生率为11.5%。三组患者之间未观察到差异。因此,头孢哌酮似乎对治疗细菌性腹腔内感染安全有效。