Hoeltgen T M, MacIntyre J M, Perlia C P, Lagakos S W, Stolbach L L, Bennett J M
Cancer. 1983 Jun 1;51(11):2005-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830601)51:11<2005::aid-cncr2820511108>3.0.co;2-y.
The results of a clinical trial involving 599 patients with inoperable squamous cell, large cell anaplastic, and adenocarcinoma of the lung are summarized. Patients were randomized to initial therapy with Cytoxan (CTX) (cyclophosphamide), or to one of two schedules of Adriamycin (doxorubicin) 50, or 75 mg/m2 IV every three weeks, or to a combined regimen of ADR and CTX. Upon disease progression, CTX patients were randomized to one of the two ADR schedules, while ADR patients were randomly assigned to CTX alone, or in combination with Cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (Cis-Platinum) 15 mg/m2 IV every three weeks. No statistically significant response or survival differences were observed between the two dose schedules of Adriamycin for any of the cell types studied. The two dose levels did, however, differ with respect to toxicity. There were some response and survival differences among the various cell types in the comparison of low-dose Adriamycin and Cytoxan: (1) patients with adenocarcinoma treated with low-dose Adriamycin tended to survive longer (P = 0.04) than those treated with Cytoxan; and (2) patients with large cell carcinoma receiving Cytoxan experienced a greater tumor response rate than those receiving low dose Adriamycin (P = 0.03). Because of the difficulties involved in distinguishing these two cell types on pathologic examination, the evidence of apparent treatment differences should not be regarded as definitive. During the period when Adriamycin plus Cytoxan was open to patient entry 61 evaluable patients received that regimen, 21 received low-dose Adriamycin and 22 received Cytoxan. Because relatively few patients received the latter two regimens, comparisons of these treatments with Adriamycin plus Cytoxan lack statistical power. However, there is no suggestion in the available data that Adriamycin plus Cytoxan increased survival either in the overall population or in the subset of patients with squamous histology. Initial performance status, metastatic disease symptoms, primary disease symptoms, and weight loss were significantly correlated to survival time, and are recommended as stratification factors in future studies.
总结了一项涉及599例无法手术的肺鳞状细胞癌、大细胞间变性癌和腺癌患者的临床试验结果。患者被随机分配接受环磷酰胺(CTX)初始治疗,或接受阿霉素(多柔比星)两种给药方案之一,即每三周静脉注射50或75mg/m²,或接受ADR与CTX的联合方案。疾病进展时,CTX组患者被随机分配至两种ADR方案之一,而ADR组患者被随机分配接受单独CTX治疗,或每三周静脉注射15mg/m²顺二氯二氨铂(顺铂)联合CTX治疗。对于所研究的任何细胞类型,阿霉素的两种剂量方案之间均未观察到具有统计学意义的反应或生存差异。然而,这两种剂量水平在毒性方面存在差异。在低剂量阿霉素与环磷酰胺的比较中,不同细胞类型之间存在一些反应和生存差异:(1)接受低剂量阿霉素治疗的腺癌患者比接受环磷酰胺治疗的患者生存时间更长(P = 0.04);(2)接受环磷酰胺治疗的大细胞癌患者的肿瘤反应率高于接受低剂量阿霉素治疗的患者(P = 0.03)。由于在病理检查中区分这两种细胞类型存在困难,明显的治疗差异证据不应被视为定论。在阿霉素加环磷酰胺方案接受患者入组期间,61例可评估患者接受了该方案,21例接受低剂量阿霉素,22例接受环磷酰胺。由于接受后两种方案的患者相对较少,将这些治疗与阿霉素加环磷酰胺进行比较缺乏统计学效力。然而,现有数据未表明阿霉素加环磷酰胺能提高总体人群或鳞状组织学患者亚组的生存率。初始体能状态、转移性疾病症状、原发性疾病症状和体重减轻与生存时间显著相关,建议在未来研究中作为分层因素。