Waldhäusl W K, Bratusch-Marrain P R, Vierhapper H, Nowotny P
Metabolism. 1983 May;32(5):478-86. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(83)90010-0.
To determine the pharmacokinetics of insulin administered by intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) pump treatment as well as by the conventional subcutaneous route, six insulin preparations of either porcine or human amino acid sequence were investigated intraindividually following IV or SC insulin infusion at two different rates (Study I) and three preparations were investigated after SC bolus injection (Study II) in healthy men. Insulin release was suppressed in Study I by IV administration of somatostatin (500 micrograms/hr) to avoid interference by endogenous insulin with the measurement of exogenous insulin. Hypoglycemia was prevented by IV administration of glucose. The data obtained demonstrated (1) greater serum concentrations of immunoreactive insulin (IRI) during continuous IV insulin infusion (141 +/- 10 (SEM) pmole/liter) than during SC insulin infusion (54 +/- 3 pmole/liter; P less than 0.0005) (0.8 U/hr); (2) return of serum IRI to baseline values following a 17-minute square wave insulin infusion (12.8 U/hr; time: 0 to 17 minutes) within 40 minutes after IV insulin infusion but not before 180 minutes after the end of SC insulin infusion; (3) peak serum IRI at 60 to 90 minutes after conventional SC insulin injection returning to baseline values at 300 minutes; and (4) identity of the pharmacokinetics of pumped human and porcine insulin within a given group as well as of the accompanying metabolic dynamics of blood glucose and nonesterified fatty acids, but heterogeneity of serum insulin after its SC bolus injection. We conclude that (1) the pharmacokinetic behavior of regular insulin depends primarily on its route of administration; (2) continuous IV infusion of an insulin dose causes significantly higher serum insulin levels than the SC administration of the identical insulin dose, and (3) hyperinsulinemia caused by a square wave insulin infusion (12.8 U/hr; time: 0 to 17 minutes) requires more than four times longer to return to baseline levels following SC administration than after IV administration of the insulin. These differences in the pharmacokinetic behavior of insulin cause a reduced bioavailability of SC administered insulin and have to be taken into account when instituting insulin treatment by various routes.
为了确定静脉注射(IV)和皮下注射(SC)泵治疗以及传统皮下途径给药的胰岛素的药代动力学,在健康男性中,分别以两种不同速率进行静脉或皮下胰岛素输注后,对六种猪或人氨基酸序列的胰岛素制剂进行了个体内研究(研究I),并在皮下推注注射后对三种制剂进行了研究(研究II)。在研究I中,通过静脉注射生长抑素(500微克/小时)抑制胰岛素释放,以避免内源性胰岛素干扰外源性胰岛素的测量。通过静脉注射葡萄糖预防低血糖。获得的数据表明:(1)持续静脉输注胰岛素期间(141±10(SEM)皮摩尔/升)的免疫反应性胰岛素(IRI)血清浓度高于皮下胰岛素输注期间(54±3皮摩尔/升;P<0.0005)(0.8单位/小时);(2)静脉输注胰岛素后40分钟内,17分钟方波胰岛素输注(12.8单位/小时;时间:0至17分钟)后血清IRI恢复至基线值,但皮下胰岛素输注结束后180分钟之前未恢复;(3)传统皮下注射胰岛素后60至90分钟血清IRI达到峰值,300分钟时恢复至基线值;(4)给定组内泵注人胰岛素和猪胰岛素的药代动力学以及血糖和非酯化脂肪酸的伴随代谢动力学相同,但皮下推注注射后血清胰岛素存在异质性。我们得出结论:(1)正规胰岛素的药代动力学行为主要取决于其给药途径;(2)持续静脉输注胰岛素剂量导致的血清胰岛素水平显著高于相同胰岛素剂量的皮下给药;(3)方波胰岛素输注(12.8单位/小时;时间:0至17分钟)引起의高胰岛素血症,皮下给药后恢复至基线水平所需时间比静脉给药后长四倍以上。胰岛素药代动力学行为的这些差异导致皮下给药胰岛素的生物利用度降低,在采用各种途径进行胰岛素治疗时必须予以考虑。