Suppr超能文献

系统性红斑狼疮与克氏锥虫免疫荧光试验。与改良法尔放射免疫分析法的对比研究。

Systemic lupus erythematosus and the crithidia luciliae immunofluorescent test. A comparative study with an adapted Farr radioimmunoassay.

作者信息

Whitehouse I J, Fehr K, Wagenhäuser F J

出版信息

Z Rheumatol. 1983 Jan-Feb;42(1):28-35.

PMID:6342296
Abstract

A comparative study of the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence (CL-IF) assay and an adapted Farr radioimmunoassay (RIA), for the measurement of antibodies to native deoxyribonucleic acid, was performed using forty-two sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and another forty-two from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Both assays were specific for SLE. The CL-IF assay was statistically significantly more sensitive than the adapted RIA assay. This significant difference was due to greater sensitivity of the CL-IF assay in the cases of sera from patients with SLE of slight activity. Additional advantages of the CL-IF assay were its use to classify the immunoglobulin types of the antibodies (most commonly IgG or IgM) and to measure complement-fixing antibodies to native deoxyribonucleic acid; it affords a simple method of selecting and following SLE patients at risk of developing severe renal disease. These advantages plus the simplicity and inexpensiveness of the CL-IF assay make it a useful tool, especially for use in small laboratories, for the study of antibodies to native deoxyribonucleic acid in patients with SLE.

摘要

利用42份系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的血清和另外42份类风湿性关节炎患者的血清,对用于检测天然脱氧核糖核酸抗体的鲁氏锥虫免疫荧光(CL-IF)试验和改良的Farr放射免疫测定法(RIA)进行了一项比较研究。两种检测方法对SLE均具有特异性。CL-IF试验在统计学上比改良的RIA试验更敏感。这种显著差异是由于CL-IF试验在轻度活动的SLE患者血清检测中具有更高的灵敏度。CL-IF试验的其他优点包括用于对抗体的免疫球蛋白类型进行分类(最常见的是IgG或IgM)以及检测针对天然脱氧核糖核酸的补体结合抗体;它为选择和跟踪有发展为严重肾脏疾病风险的SLE患者提供了一种简单的方法。这些优点加上CL-IF试验的简单性和低成本,使其成为一种有用的工具,特别是对于小型实验室而言,可用于研究SLE患者的天然脱氧核糖核酸抗体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验