Omura G A, Major F J, Blessing J A, Sedlacek T V, Thigpen J T, Creasman W T, Zaino R J
Cancer. 1983 Aug 15;52(4):626-32. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830815)52:4<626::aid-cncr2820520409>3.0.co;2-e.
Various drug combinations including Adriamycin have been tested in soft tissue sarcomas, but optimal treatment remains unclear. We have evaluated Adriamycin with and without dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide (DTIC) in the treatment of Stage III or IV and recurrent sarcomas of the uterus. Two hundred and forty cases of these rare tumors were evaluable. Of 146 evaluable patients with measurable disease, 13/80 (16.3%) of Adriamycin-treated patients and 16/66 (24.2%) of patients receiving the combination showed an objective response (P greater than 0.05). Lung metastases responded more frequently (P equal to 0.04) to combination therapy, but there was no survival advantage. For patients with nonmeasurable disease the progression-free interval was similar (10.0 months for Adriamycin and 8.0 months for the combination). Leiomyosarcomas had a significantly longer survival than other cell types (12.1 versus 6.0 months, P less than 0.001) but there was no advantage for either regimen. There was a suggestion that heterologous mixed mesodermal sarcomas were more responsive to the combination (27.3 versus 8.7%). The addition of DTIC produced significantly more hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity. Other Adriamycin combinations should be evaluated in uterine sarcomas.
包括阿霉素在内的各种药物组合已在软组织肉瘤中进行了测试,但最佳治疗方案仍不明确。我们评估了阿霉素联合或不联合二甲基三氮烯咪唑甲酰胺(DTIC)治疗Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期及复发性子宫肉瘤的效果。这240例这类罕见肿瘤患者可进行评估。在146例可评估的有可测量病灶的患者中,接受阿霉素治疗的80例患者中有13例(16.3%)出现客观缓解,接受联合治疗的66例患者中有16例(24.2%)出现客观缓解(P>0.05)。联合治疗对肺转移的缓解率更高(P=0.04),但在生存方面无优势。对于无可测量病灶的患者,无进展生存期相似(阿霉素治疗组为10.0个月,联合治疗组为8.0个月)。平滑肌肉瘤的生存期明显长于其他细胞类型(分别为12.1个月和6.0个月,P<0.001),但两种治疗方案均无优势。有迹象表明,异源性混合中胚层肉瘤对联合治疗的反应性更高(分别为27.3%和8.7%)。添加DTIC会产生明显更多的血液学和胃肠道毒性。其他阿霉素组合应在子宫肉瘤中进行评估。