Suppr超能文献

肿瘤雌激素和孕激素受体水平对原发性乳腺癌中他莫昔芬及化疗反应的影响。

Influence of tumor estrogen and progesterone receptor levels on the response to tamoxifen and chemotherapy in primary breast cancer.

作者信息

Fisher B, Redmond C, Brown A, Wickerham D L, Wolmark N, Allegra J, Escher G, Lippman M, Savlov E, Wittliff J

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1983 Apr;1(4):227-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1983.1.4.227.

Abstract

In 1977 the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project initiated a prospectively randomized clinical trial for women with primary operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. In this study 1891 patients were randomized to receive L-phenylalanine mustard and 5-fluorouracil (PF) either with or without tamoxifen (T). In this interim report findings are presented concerning disease-free survival (DFS) and survival as related to age and to estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) content of the tumor. The median follow-up time is 3 yr. Patients 50 yr of age or older with either 1-3 or more than 3 positive axillary nodes had a markedly longer disease-free survival on PFT than did those receiving PF adjuvant therapy (p less than 0.001). The effectiveness of PFT was related to the levels of tumor receptors. Patients 50 yr old or more with both tumor ER and PR levels of 10 fmole or more ("high") displayed the greatest benefit in disease-free survival from PFT (p = 0.004). Analyses by age indicated that it is more appropriate to divide patients of 50 yr or older into two age groups, 50-59 and 60-70 yr old. In the former the survival results were poorer on PFT when tumor PR was low, whereas, regardless of receptor levels, those 60-70 yr old experienced an advantage on PFT. In women under 50 yr of age, there was no difference in disease-free survival (p = 0.64), but survival results favored the PF over the PFT treated (p = 0.06). Patients under 50 yr with tumor ER and PR levels under 10 fmole ("low") had a poorer survival when given PFT (p = 0.003). Those whose tumors demonstrated a high ER and a low PR also had a shorter survival on PFT (p = 0.01). The observation of no benefit in younger patients when both receptor levels were high, but a benefit in older patients with receptor-poor tumors, indicates that, at least according to the conditions of this study, the difference between the two age groups cannot be explained by the association of age with receptor content. Multivariate analyses considered the effects of the number of positive nodes, age, ER, and PR. They support the conclusion that, while nodes and ER exert strong prognostic influences in both PF- and PFT-treated patients, the PR content of tumors is a stronger predictor of the effectiveness of PFT therapy than is ER content.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

1977年,国家乳腺与肠道外科辅助治疗项目启动了一项针对原发性可手术乳腺癌且腋窝淋巴结阳性女性的前瞻性随机临床试验。在这项研究中,1891例患者被随机分为两组,分别接受左旋苯丙氨酸氮芥和5-氟尿嘧啶(PF)联合或不联合他莫昔芬(T)治疗。在这份中期报告中,呈现了与无病生存期(DFS)以及与年龄、肿瘤雌激素受体(ER)和/或孕激素受体(PR)含量相关的生存情况。中位随访时间为3年。50岁及以上、腋窝淋巴结1 - 3个阳性或超过3个阳性的患者,接受PF加T(PFT)辅助治疗的无病生存期明显长于接受PF辅助治疗的患者(p < 0.001)。PFT的有效性与肿瘤受体水平有关。50岁及以上、肿瘤ER和PR水平均为10飞摩尔或更高(“高”)的患者,从PFT治疗中获得的无病生存期获益最大(p = 0.004)。按年龄分析表明,将50岁及以上患者分为50 - 59岁和60 - 70岁两个年龄组更为合适。在前者中,当肿瘤PR水平低时,PFT治疗的生存结果较差,而在60 - 70岁患者中,无论受体水平如何,PFT治疗都具有优势。在50岁以下女性中,无病生存期无差异(p = 0.64),但生存结果显示PF治疗优于PFT治疗(p = 0.06)。50岁以下、肿瘤ER和PR水平低于10飞摩尔(“低”)的患者接受PFT治疗时生存较差(p = 0.003)。肿瘤ER高而PR低的患者接受PFT治疗时生存期也较短(p = 0.01)。在两个受体水平都高的年轻患者中未观察到获益,但在受体水平低的老年患者中观察到获益,这表明,至少根据本研究的条件,两个年龄组之间的差异不能用年龄与受体含量的关联来解释。多因素分析考虑了阳性淋巴结数量、年龄、ER和PR的影响。这些分析支持以下结论:虽然淋巴结和ER在接受PF和PFT治疗的患者中均具有很强的预后影响,但肿瘤的PR含量比ER含量更能预测PFT治疗的有效性。(摘要截断于400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验