Toischer H P
Rofo. 1983 Jul;139(1):21-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1055833.
In a retrospective clinical study, 150 unselected double contrast examinations of the stomach using conventional contrast media (100 g/100 ml barium sulphate) were compared with a similar number of examinations using a high density contrast medium of low viscosity (250 g/100 ml barium sulphate). The high density contrast medium was distinctly better for demonstrating detail of the gastric mucosa. The uneveness of coating and instability of the older high density contrast media was observed in 15.5% of cases and, in no instance, did this make it impossible to reach a diagnosis.
在一项回顾性临床研究中,对150例未经过挑选、使用传统造影剂(100克/100毫升硫酸钡)进行的胃部双重对比检查与同样数量使用低粘度高密度造影剂(250克/100毫升硫酸钡)的检查进行了比较。高密度造影剂在显示胃黏膜细节方面明显更好。在15.5%的病例中观察到旧的高密度造影剂存在涂层不均匀和稳定性问题,但在任何情况下,这都未导致无法做出诊断。