van Riel P L, van de Putte L B, Gribnau F W, Macrae K D
Clin Rheumatol. 1984 Mar;3 Suppl 1:51-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03342622.
Fifty-two patients with rheumatoid arthritis were studied in a single blind trial comparing aurothioglucose and auranofin. The duration of the study was 52 weeks. Twenty-six patients, 13 in each treatment group, dropped out during the first year of treatment. The main reason for discontinuing treatment with aurothioglucose was adverse reactions and, in the auranofin group, lack of efficacy. In those patients who continued therapy the results of treatment were comparable; patients on aurothioglucose improved slightly more than auranofin treated patients, although the difference was not statistically significant.
在一项比较金硫葡萄糖和金诺芬的单盲试验中,对52例类风湿性关节炎患者进行了研究。研究持续时间为52周。26例患者(每个治疗组13例)在治疗的第一年退出。停用金硫葡萄糖治疗的主要原因是不良反应,而在金诺芬组中则是缺乏疗效。在继续治疗的患者中,治疗结果具有可比性;接受金硫葡萄糖治疗的患者改善程度略高于接受金诺芬治疗的患者,尽管差异无统计学意义。