Ridell M
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1984 Dec;258(4):492-7. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(84)80026-7.
Four strains of Nocardia amarae and four strains of Rhodococcus equi (earlier designated Corynebacterium equi) were analysed by means of the comparative immunodiffusion technique for taxonomical purposes. Nineteen reference precipitation systems, representing different species of Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Nocardia, Rhodococcus, Streptomyces, and related taxa were employed. The N. amarae strains differed serologically from the reference strains of Nocardia and their assignment to the latter genus was therefore questioned. Furthermore, the results provided additional evidence for the view that R. equi belongs to the genus Rhodococcus and not to the genus Corynebacterium.
为了进行分类学研究,采用比较免疫扩散技术对4株阿马拉诺卡菌和4株马红球菌(以前称为马棒状杆菌)进行了分析。使用了19种参考沉淀系统,它们代表棒状杆菌属、分枝杆菌属、诺卡菌属、红球菌属、链霉菌属及相关分类单元的不同种。阿马拉诺卡菌菌株在血清学上与诺卡菌属的参考菌株不同,因此对其归属于后者这一分类提出了质疑。此外,结果为马红球菌属于红球菌属而非棒状杆菌属这一观点提供了更多证据。