Kent R S, Carew T E, LeWinter M M, Covell J W
Am J Physiol. 1978 Apr;234(4):H392-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1978.234.4.H392.
Septal to free wall dimensions are frequently employed for the analysis of diastolic compliance. However, the diastolic properties of these anatomically distinct regions of left ventricle are not well characterized. Regional compliance was studied in eight open-chest anesthetized dogs. Pairs of 2-mm-diameter piezoelectric crystals were implanted in the left ventricular free wall or septum 1.38 +/- 0.06 cm apart at a midwall location 58% +/- 1.9 of the left ventricular endocardial-epicardial or left ventricular endocardial-right ventricular endocardial distance. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was increased from an average of 8.1-21.0 mmHg, with a resulting average maximum end-diastolic strain of 11% (end-diastolic (ED) segment length/control ED length). Regional stiffness was assessed at all sites based on the relationship between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and regional strain. Neither strain nor calculated stiffness coefficients differed significantly among the three sites. Septal transmural pressure (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure--right ventricular end-diastolic pressure) was nearly constant as left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased during volume infusion and thus did not account for the observed septal strain.
室间隔与游离壁的尺寸常用于舒张期顺应性分析。然而,左心室这些解剖学上不同区域的舒张特性尚未得到充分表征。对8只开胸麻醉犬的区域顺应性进行了研究。将一对直径为2毫米的压电晶体植入左心室游离壁或室间隔,相距1.38±0.06厘米,位于左心室内膜-外膜或左心室内膜-右心室内膜距离的58%±1.9处的中层壁位置。左心室舒张末期压力从平均8.1 mmHg增加到21.0 mmHg,导致平均最大舒张末期应变达到11%(舒张末期(ED)节段长度/对照ED长度)。基于左心室舒张末期压力与区域应变之间的关系,评估了所有部位的区域僵硬度。三个部位的应变和计算得出的僵硬度系数均无显著差异。在容量输注期间,随着左心室舒张末期压力升高,室间隔跨壁压(左心室舒张末期压力 - 右心室舒张末期压力)几乎保持恒定,因此不能解释观察到的室间隔应变。