Ajalat G M, Mulder D G
Arch Surg. 1984 Nov;119(11):1318-20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390230084021.
Since 1971 we have treated 33 patients with esophageal perforation caused by instrumentation in 21 patients, trauma in six, and spontaneous perforation in six. Chest pain, fever, mediastinal air, and an abnormal esophagogram were frequent but not invariable findings. Surgical therapy, consisting of primary repair and drainage in 12 patients, drainage alone in five, esophageal diversion in two, and esophagogastrectomy in one, was initiated within 24 hours in 14 patients, all of whom survived. A delay of more than 24 hours in six patients resulted in 33% mortality. Nine patients with small instrumental perforations were treated successfully with antibiotics alone, while three other patients with late traumatic (n = 2) and spontaneous (n = 1) perforations were treated nonoperatively; all three died. Overall mortality for the series was 15.5%. Except for small contained instrumental injuries, esophageal perforations demand prompt exploration, with primary repair and drainage as the procedure of choice.
自1971年以来,我们共治疗了33例食管穿孔患者,其中21例由器械操作引起,6例由外伤引起,6例为自发性穿孔。胸痛、发热、纵隔积气和食管造影异常是常见表现,但并非总是出现。手术治疗包括12例行一期修复和引流、5例仅行引流、2例行食管转流术、1例行食管胃切除术。14例患者在24小时内接受手术治疗,全部存活。6例延迟超过24小时手术的患者死亡率为33%。9例器械操作所致小穿孔患者仅用抗生素治疗成功,另外3例晚期外伤(2例)和自发性(1例)穿孔患者接受非手术治疗,均死亡。该系列患者总体死亡率为15.5%。除器械操作所致小的局限性损伤外,食管穿孔需及时探查,首选一期修复和引流。