Garst J E
J Pharm Sci. 1984 Nov;73(11):1623-9. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600731134.
Occasionally, results from the highly reproducible automated log P(o/w) measurement (ALPM) differ from those determined by shake-flask methods. Several specific examples affording different values are presented. One source of these differences may be curvilinearity in plots of log (t - t0) versus percent methanol, which complicate accurate intercept determinations and, thus, estimates of log P(o/w). Other sources of these differences are presented and discussed, although their cause remains unclear. Equilibrium ALPM log P(o/w) measurements of various phenyl-, methyl-, fluoro-, chloro-, and bromobenzenes, suggest substituent constants are not strictly additive. Moreover, the higher values indicate that calculated values may not be accurate for those compounds having multiple substituents or high log P(o/w) values. ALPM gives better predictability of the in vivo concentration process of 8 or 12 toxicants in fish than the shake-flask method, another HPLC method, or even calculated log P(o/w) values. However, it equally correlates the binding to bovine serum albumin by 34 chemicals as predicted by a combination of shake-flask and calculated log P(o/w) values reported elsewhere.
偶尔,高度可重复的自动log P(o/w)测量(ALPM)结果与摇瓶法测定的结果不同。文中给出了几个产生不同值的具体例子。这些差异的一个来源可能是log (t - t0)对甲醇百分比的曲线关系,这使得准确确定截距变得复杂,进而影响log P(o/w)的估计。文中还介绍并讨论了这些差异的其他来源,尽管其原因尚不清楚。对各种苯基、甲基、氟、氯和溴苯的平衡ALPM log P(o/w)测量表明,取代基常数并非严格可加。此外,较高的值表明,对于具有多个取代基或高log P(o/w)值的化合物,计算值可能不准确。与摇瓶法、另一种高效液相色谱法甚至计算得到的log P(o/w)值相比,ALPM对鱼类体内8种或12种毒物的浓度过程具有更好的预测性。然而,与其他地方报道的摇瓶法和计算得到的log P(o/w)值相结合所预测的结果一样,它同样能体现34种化学物质与牛血清白蛋白的结合情况。