Bentsen B G
Fam Pract. 1984 Jun;1(2):86-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/1.2.86.
Observations in epidemiological, operational or sociomedical research often need to be related to a denominator to obtain a measure of rate. Defining the denominator for a particular population at risk is a difficult task. The basis of this study was a census track study combined with a survey questionnaire which included every household in a part of Nes municipality, in Norway. This meant it was possible to define the population at risk nearly perfectly. The results were compared with official records and the records of general practitioners. Some of the pitfalls in deciding on the population at risk are discussed: the newborn and the dead, the migrants, the institutionalized, the incomplete census tract, patients in contact with other physicians, the non-attenders, including 'the forgotten'. Eight different approaches to the estimation of the denominator are briefly commented on.
在流行病学、操作研究或社会医学研究中,观察结果往往需要与一个分母相关联,以获得率的度量。为特定的风险人群定义分母是一项艰巨的任务。本研究的基础是一项人口普查跟踪研究,并结合了一份调查问卷,该问卷涵盖了挪威内斯市一部分地区的每一户家庭。这意味着几乎可以完美地定义风险人群。研究结果与官方记录以及全科医生的记录进行了比较。文中讨论了在确定风险人群时的一些陷阱:新生儿与死亡者、移民、机构收容人员、不完整的普查区域、与其他医生接触的患者、未就诊者,包括“被遗忘者”。简要评论了估计分母的八种不同方法。